THE ESSENTIALS REPORT |
Baltimore, M.D. - With gas prices in the United States seeing record levels of inflation and steady increases at the pump, not sure how the COP24 will now achieve its less carbon footprint emissions goals. Furthermore, what appears to be a pattern and growing Twitter announcement trend until the $44billion purchase price is the sudden spike in members of Congress and governing officials testing positive with COVID-19 not coronavirus. The remedy or any reasonable resolve for the coronavirus has yet to reach over counter recommendations, but many people are able to take home a COVID-19 test for free. Congresswoman Shelia Jackson-Lee who has been fighting on the frontline for reparations is the most recent member of Congress to announce on Twitter their COVID-19 testing results with limited symptoms or self-care measures or doctors' recommendations to say it safe.
What type of polymerase chain reaction test was administered? The PCR test is to detect genetic material from a specific organism and considering the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA booster is a protein synthesizer it's a strong possibility the testing results would be positive. Was it the standard PCR test or something more beneficial for biotech market boosters? What type of symptoms did Congresswoman Jackson-Lee experience? According to her Twitter account a statement was released on May 16th, which read "Congresswoman Shelia Jackson Lee tested positive for COVID. She is fully vaccinated and has received her boosters. She encourages everyone to get tested and fully vaccinated along with their booster shots. She looks forward to a full and complete recovery." This statement doesn't allude at any symptoms just test results and encouragement. Moving right along, members of Congress don't have the coronavirus they only have tested positive for COVID. With social media networking platform Twitter being the leading healthcare facilitator regardless of the hazardous waste bots this has been the best public square for members of Congress to engage with their constituency and announce either they have taken their booster shot or they have just tested positive for COVID with vague symptoms being experienced or not even mentioned. Their COVID conditions have not been to substantial levels which require short term hospitalization, just some quarantine life of isolation for a few days in accordance with the most recent CDC guidelines that doesn't confuse the consumer. The District of Columbia forgot to report its COVID numbers to the CDC despite Mayor Muriel Bowser announcing to her friends that she tested positive for COVID and had allergy like symptoms. She took an at-home test on April 7, and her household remains negative. "I'm grateful that I can work at home while following isolation protocols," Bowser tweeted to her friends. She is rather fortunate considering her sister passed away due to COVID complications. In an effort to amass enough votes for the DC Primary election held on June 21, Mayor Bowser was probably huddling with her team and forgot to take a minute to report critical healthcare data. Despite DC sending weekly COVID data to the Center for Disease Control both automatically and manually, between April 27, 2022, and May 8th, it wasn't reported to the CDC and only used to calculate community levels and didn't submit that data but has since been restored according to DC Health. Did members of Congress favor Pfizer or Moderna booster? Or could their booster be an alternative form not offered to the general populous? How many boosters did these members of Congress and governing officials take? Did they experience any symptoms when they took their first booster? Did they experience the same mild symptoms or did a scratchy throat present the most severe symptom? What symptoms did they experience before taking the PCR test? Or were there no symptoms and just randomly felt the need to take a PCR test and the results read positive? Considering the devastation and irreversible damage the coronavirus has caused the country and entire world, what was their initial reaction to the positive PCR test results? Did Congresswoman Jackson Lee panic or was she calm knowing the Biden Administration rebranded Obamacare would provide the necessary treatment plan considering their target goal of a 100 million "fair shots." What did the doctor recommend for these members of Congress and governing officials who have contracted COVID based on PCR positive test results to cure their symptoms?
Is the polymerase chain reaction test qualified and of quality to reveal which variant of COVID these members of Congress and governing officials test positive for? Omicron was the last hotspot conjunction for the spread. Where did these members of Congress and governing officials get their PCR test from? Are these the same test which are free and have been distributed at mass scale for public consumption and use? Did the doctor recommend any therapeutics? These tweets are tremendous but also don't take into consideration the potential health discrimination they have aligned with and allowed fester like an open wound? How was the health of these governing officials and members of Congress before taking the booster? The people don't know many pre-existing health conditions of these officials prior to them being punctured with a booster of WHO know what formulas. America has always been approached as the "great experiment," and in 2022 this buzz phrase has a different milestone marker and measuring tool, PCR test. According to former President Obama the experiment testing phase has found over 1 billion people to induct into the biotech sphere new world. God Bless the vaccine makers and all ventilation machines, Amen.
0 Comments
If you tend to think that 24-hours isn't enough time, just imagine how much can occur in 365 days. Needless to mention, the first 100 days of the Biden-Harris Administration. A baby can be born. A state can improve its statues to sustain the needs of constituent's support beyond campaign season. And the United States Supreme Court can opt-out to deny due process of law when big tech is on the docket. Furthermore, a mysterious leak of opinion coming from the highest court in the land pertaining to the case of Roe v Wade is up for some major modifications went circulating like a California wildfire. In which caused several concerned citizens to mobilize in front of the United States Supreme Court. What is Roe v Wade? A case which established a woman's right to have an abortion without undue restrictive interference from the government. The Court held that a woman's right to decide for herself to bring or not bring a pregnancy to term is guaranteed under the Fourteenth Amendment. A Texas law prohibiting abortions had been challenged by an unmarried pregnant woman (Roe) and the court ruled in her favor, finding that the state had violated her right to privacy. Justice Harry A. Blackmun wrote that a woman is entitled to obtain an abortion freely, after consultation with a doctor, in the first trimester and in an authorized clinic in the second trimester. Coming to grips with Terms An abortion is defined as a deliberate expulsion of a fetus, and a fetus is an unborn young. Don't dare call the demonstration or gathering in front of the USSC an insurrection. It is just citizens exercising their first amendment rights possibly. Moreover, what leaves much standing ovation for an opinion is the obvious obstacles- no elephant in the room, the irony of the recent justice Ketanji Jackson-Brown being confirmed as the first "Black Woman Justice," and the onset and swift rise of policing the body of a woman. Despite the Justice not having any politically correct or definition for what a woman is beyond Vanity Fair's "Woman of the Year" spread featuring Catilyn Jenner. A womb is a noun in the part of speech or sentence structure and defined as a uterus according to Webster's New Pocket Dictionary. That same pocket dictionary defines a woman as an adult female person. And womanish is like a woman. Another definition for a woman is an adult female human and man is a "human being." These are indeed some delicate and disturbing times we're living in currently. Whether someone is suffering from depression, dilemmas, disassociation or decluttering, in the words of Katie Couric now is a tremendous time to "deprogram." The irony or disassociation of not being able to define a woman as one of the highest justices in the United States and less than 30 days later an opinion on abortion rights leaks from the supreme rule of law on the land, the USSC. Did any Justice ever consider what good faith is the rule of law if the opinions of the Justices are simply treated like a sidebar for failing news extensions in this digital wave and era? Who could've been in such rage and torment where they intended to cause temper tantrums to flare as if Congress isn't attempting to reduce carbon emissions? People have been taking turns yelling about the body choices of other women whether abortion is perceived as a positive or negative body image. Where is the buzz and trendline for "my body my choice?" Perhaps such dogma tends to be at its highest peak and application when one identifies their sexuality before their cultural ethnicity. The right to choose is a phrase not as common or resounding as #BlackLivesMatter in any socialized setting. However, each person or individual is afforded that right. Now if that person or individual freely gives up that right to anyone, allowing opportunity for infringement upon those rights, then that is solely the responsibility of them to seek redress. When people consent and agree to certain conditions regardless of the terms such as going through with a full-term pregnancy appears more accepting in a religious rite of passage than socialized method or approach, although not being a standard most appealing to the populous. There are also religions which suggest sacrificing a child to a certain deity or God isn't a sin but holy sacrament. Some women and now males with uterus implants thanks to university research could become parents to their offspring if they so choose as of right now, but that can change in the next 72 hours. Not every reason to have offspring will be suitable standard nor synchronicity to the morals and dogma some may uphold, but ultimately the decision is up to the woman. Whatever that person's reason is for leaking the opinion of the 1973 Roe v Wade ruling in a society where men are granted rights to compete in women's sports if they so choose. But moving on to a more sensationalist note, Press Secretary Jen Psaki is stepping down to deliver more newsworthy opinions over at MSNBC. Hopefully she's got that, and it works out since the news wasn't working for Washington at one point. The beat doesn't go on when abortion is the conversation. The views and opinions of the public before a major leak, which appears to be bigger than Watergate. |
AuthorWelcome to the Mindy Jo News Show presents: The Essentials Report, examining the world through an environmental justice lens. Archives
April 2024
Categories |