BACK TO THE BASICS |
A member of the 4th establishment with a 2016 digital charter who created this lane in this digital game with original content leaving a stain that they can't white out nor ride this wave! What more can I say after nine years of delivering original digital news content except for Thank You! My shield is built beyond Ford tough and is a force to reckon with. "Because the 1st Amendment to the United States Constitution prescribes freedom, of the press, it is important to understand the development of news reporting in this country. Today's news delivery is the result of a tug-of-war between audiences as they define the types of news, they want and the news media who try to deliver it," Media Impact-Chapter 13. Having the tools to complete any task makes the productivity more efficient and reliable showing that you are dependable. This is applicable to journalism. And in this digital era being able to reach your audience is always important! Journalist training takes time and Wis worth every second spent immersed in any lesson from ethics to feature writing. What works for your reporting style will not always be the same for others and as a journalist that is key because in the end that is what makes you unique among any competitions. Being in a rush is not the right road to take in this digital media market which has emerged - it will show forth and you can possibly be ridiculed. The time invested in conducting research will allow for great conversations and rest is what I have learned over these last 9 years. As I reflect on the many years of building my foundation, the format has transformed in various aspects from the materials used such as a VHS tape to how you deliver your digital news with advertising models now scaling or widening your reach. A great project would be to count how many SD cards which have been used over the past 9 years and learning to repair some is a plus. Overall, it has been outstanding to achieve such stainability over these last 9 streaming years, and your support is greatly appreciated! The reward is knowing that you are a pillar in the community always recognizing that your audience sets the standard, and the quality is up to the digital news outlet. Once again thank you for your support! Join us in this celebration by contributing $9 to our building fund!
0 Comments
Technology changes so swifty! Something like every three months there's an update! That is tremendous when it functions at optimal speed function and performance with minimal error. Testing technology can help achieve optimal speed and function. And what subject matter used for the study to observe should be done with good intention especially considering the mechanism is artificial. Our dependency on technology is similar to the shelves being depleted of baby formula forgetting that an alternative method and solution can be sought after. The ability to communicate effectively with the utilization of technology can use some uplifting and shifting in its approach with certain messages we want to convey to our audience. There are good and bad aspects of technology. Your experience depends on a few factors, one being affordability and the second is your intentions followed by your motivation. What you feed the algorithm is what remains in your digital footprint and ecosystem and eventually will be used against you in a tech society. Be sure you're not racing against a machine that doesn't turn off and can possibly turn on and against you. Who wanted to race, because only one showed up at the finish line? The Glitch v The Gag. Loading Videos... More Diplomatic Real Time than Tik Tok when mitigating bias by Big Tech design with vast networking7/26/2022 In the Big Tech battlefield, it is very mind boggling because so many artificial agents and characters roam while acting. And if the subject of the civil action branch matter secured a cue card and acted in such manner it would have been classified as a criminal act. What's most concerning is the fact that one sector of your family was allege freed from their slave master but some down in Louisiana still uphold that mind set with stealing land through deceitful acts of purchase while playing pony show shuffle. Being duly sworn under oath against any multinational corporation is very serious and when the other party doesn't show up not sure which adhesion clause will stick later on. "Neither slavery no involuntary servitude except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction," the US Constitution. What has been shocking over the years is the standard review and unlawful practices and actions which have been carried out securing a big tech seat at the Meta Verse when they were not a party in the matter. And not one memo to date issuing an apology which isn't omission to the cyber-attack. Although your honor expressed it would be daunting it was deemed of high priority and very necessary to take the risk and bring #BigTech to the court dockets. Furthermore, the discussion is now left up to the United States Supreme Court and their decision will affect the whole not just that one American journalist and woman. When mitigating bias by big tech design and networking agents and governmental agencies it can be alarming. This is a different timeline from what the defendants requested on July 26, 2018.
January 16, 2019 - DC Superior Court entered a judgement against plaintiff in favor of defendants Google and YouTube.
Opinions are in close relation to rear end excitement so as an American journalist it is imperative to always set the record straight if it was rearranged for sensationalist sexual appeals. Luckily, the American journalist didn't write herself out of "The Journalist that lost sight of her shield in Washington, DC" Fall 2009. She needed her full armor and Tory Burch combat boots for the unforeseen big tech battle in December 2016 that was building up in the background. Calling case number 5 in the matter of Hill v Google __ et al; The court: Very well. Thank you. All right. I looked at this case, and Ms. Hill I'm going to direct my remarks to you preliminary. Are you licensed to practice law? The American journalist replied, "Not at the moment I am not." Google's administrative rights have been the result of a "simple technical glitch" cyber-attack which still has no equity in its resolution. But the preexisting conditions and torture for #bigtech titans was catastrophic. The District of Columbia and all its shellfish al carte adhesion clauses didn't satisfy their #bigtech cravings by creating fables. Furthermore, they lack significant digital content to determine their market area. And in essence much latency exists, which is very ludicrous with no value. But will go through extreme measures if one excels beyond Microsoft standards and didn't require their grooming experience of elaborate emotional appeal by regurgitation of rhetoric which has exceeded the outdated 400 years a slave driver story. Moreover, where is the digital advertising revenue model and structure for the stream? It's only been over 5 years the digital media pioneer and American journalist has been waiting for the allege prestige. "How can I assess a value on a market which is emerging, and my competition has the investors but no content for the market?" Ms. Hill asked in a series of questions relating to a contingency agreement. "If that's the case then we have to identify the current market that your work is operating in and go from that point forward. It may seem unfair but given the time we are operating in we can't hold out and hope a new market develops rapidly," the legal expert suggested. What is the problem? The districts agencies arranged and collaborated for a wide range intersectionality networking tactical aggressive force which was carried out and used by the District of Columbia's "special task force," for filing a lawsuit against Google and YouTube. As if a no show on behalf of the defense wasn't substantial enough or the further frolicking to pull the file off the civil action branch matter docket is very delirious and destructive. Someone assumed the wrong bedroom position for some penetration and pleasure considering the law office left off July 26, 2018, with finding LGBT Fellowship and clerk experience in the DC Court of Appeals. What awful arousal and erection because the case brought forth wasn't embedded in any sheets, but telecommunications and violation of the Communications Act with regards to closed captioning was the matter and correcting the error was the goal. But their law objectives for orchestrated desires changed the actions on the docket. Unbeknown to the American journalist, she wouldn't discover the debauchery surrounding a compelled caller between the states of North Carolina and Louisiana until a few years later. What the compelling caller must now convey to the court of law in 2022 is why would someone who had unconditional love and cared for a child then abruptly at the spontaneous age of 13 wait to neglect them? What common sense does that make especially when the care wasn't based in ballots counted after the masses have gone to cast a vote, but to provide a better lifestyle. It looks like Google did afford that opportunity many years later while there is much equity found in her big tech intellectual property. This could very well be the same intellectual property which was served at the GUMBO Fest in Louisiana for a table of 13.
According to the historical theme of IFSA-INT-470 paper no prior Child Protection Service history and it was learned that a family arrangement and not the result of CPS involvement for the guardian of the child. A motion was filed for extension of time to produce a brief and appendix by April 17, 2019. On April 22, 2019, the American journalist expressed her ongoing legal case with Google related to a caption on one of her news stories, the report stated. Because Ms. Hill didn't respond like an MK ultra-victim to their created crisis perhaps that is why her natural character and personality traits were of concern for the bad circus actors. Ms. Hill has too high of a vibration for those empty vessels who frolic and roam for a home. The CFSA social worker was furious when she learned Ms. Hill's race is "original." The call could have rung out from the law office of Harris Wiltshire and Grannis incubator holding space in North Carolina, or the family, which was freed in Louisian, but many members want to uphold their slave masters mind set in bondage and captivity. Moreover, what's mesmerizing and rather manic of DC Attorney General Karl Racine and the entire DC Child Family Service Agency is the fact they forgot the person who they created a false narrative about did state she was in a legal battle with Google. Nonetheless, what are the odds of HWG Video Relay Service client attending a conference, April 8-11, 2019, around the same time the American journalist requested transcripts? 1 in 100 million. From false allegations an extensive July 11, 2019, report fabricated by Amanda Bayer, an allege Child Family Service social worker with only 8 months of experience from the state of Louisiana was able to substantiate false child neglect allegations because Ms. Hill requested #bigtech transcripts, and one of the actions brought forth against Google was negligence along with defamation and libel. Then the incompetent Child Family Service Agency attorney derives over 100 questions from the compelled caller's concerns. Apparently, they missed that Video Relay Memo from Roy Austin, Jr., on April 8, 2019. Not certain if this was beneficial for the big tech deals that were to be distributed so DC Attorney General overstepped his authority and jurisdiction by ordering a petition if the crisis agency had already confirmed no need for further hospitalization observation. Moreover, the court did not have a record of the account although there is a letterhead agreement to execute an FD-12 involuntary order. Was it any added value that the American journalist had reached out to DC Mayor Muriel Bowser January 16, 2019, regarding Google and the DC Superior Court? There is a strong possibility that DC Attorney General Racine must've remained in the state of assumption because the American journalist didn't discover the law office's Video Relay Service client until broadband was the 2022 buzz and delivered by Vice President Kamala Harris in Sunset, Louisiana. However, Ms. Hill did present the 21st century question while at the FCC December 2016. In fact, a contractor for the FCC attended the April 8-11, 2019, VRS conference in Salt Lake City, Utah. In a world of artificial gimmicks and illusions the American journalist has no sympathy for those who inflicted hurt harm danger and destroyed her unique familial structure through aggressive methods of torture because she stood her ground against big tech takers and talkers under drunken assumptions in Washington. The decision to act in such maritime law manner without any regards for the American journalist human rights is the reason why so many will be subject matter to much case law coming soon. By the way, who will turn in the American journalist Google docs, the incorporated version, she operates an LLC? Meanwhile, they were in a state of assumption for adhesion bargains the American journalist brought the lawless actions and behaviors of bad actors to the Disciplinary board on June 26, 2019. The response was to report her concern to the court of law. Through extensive learning it is now obvious what method they specialize in and practice - deceit delivered by denied due process of law. It wasn't a daunting task for the American journalist to save herself. Those 60 seconds were lifesaving and worth the risk taken. The last shall be first according to the scripture reading, and no man shall leap to the Meta Verse from the labor of another American journalist and woman. The law office of decoy incubators is responsible for assembling big tech intellectual property the mighty counselor Podesta left off with an appendix on page 69. That is a great position for 19-CV-69, and the posture for the pleasure which suits their lack of morals, principals, ethics, and their character is embedded in pillow talk with displeasing sexual gratification. Sometimes you feel like a nut, unless a squirrel gets it first! They frolic for big tech thrills, but no one solicited for a feel up the dress of the American journalist. "You appeared unannounced at the offices of Harris Wiltshire and Grannis LLP around 5:45 pm on Thursday, April 4, 2019. That appearance was your 3rd unsolicited visit to our offices. Because of your conduct on that occasion, which included deliberately smashing a glass on the floor, you were expressly told to leave, and we made it clear to you at that time that you are no welcome in our offices. This letter serves further notice that you are barred from entering the office of Harris Wiltshire & Grannis LLP. Any further attempts to enter the offices of Harris Wiltshire & Grannis LLP will result in a call to the police," Roy Austin, Jr. wrote on company letterhead addressed to the American journalist. Her armor protected her, and her Tory Burch combat boots remained on the big tech battle ground, and she is a force - bar none and fade all the Wolf PACS of Washington and artificial bar talkers under drunken assumptions for adhesion bargains. They deserve to bake in the sun, call it climate change. WASHINGTON, DC – Today, Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (NY-08), Chairman of the House Democratic Caucus and a member of the Judiciary Committee, voted to pass H.R. 8404, the Respect for Marriage Act, bipartisan legislation to enshrine and protect marriage equality for same-sex and interracial couples. Rep. Jeffries was instrumental in drafting the legislative language to protect the marriage rights of interracial couples. Earlier this year, when the Court overturned the right to an abortion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in a concurring opinion that they “should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precedents.” “Love does not discriminate and neither should the law. During more enlightened times, the Supreme court righted injustices and gave interracial and same-sex couples the freedom to marry who they love,” said Rep. Jeffries. “Those rights are now at risk because of the out-of-control, radical, right-wing Supreme Court majority. Through spurious legal theory and illogic, Clarence Thomas may think that these rights are now up for grabs, but today a bipartisan coalition led by House Democrats stood up and put people over politics by passing this legislation to protect marriage equality for same-sex and interracial couples.” In the 1967 Loving v. Virginia decision, the Supreme Court ended all race-based restrictions on marriage and found laws that ban them violated both the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the 14th Amendment. In 2015, the Court held that same-sex couples had a right to marry guaranteed by both of the same Clauses of the 14th Amendment. In 1973, in the Roe v. Wade decision, the Court held that the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment provided a right to privacy which granted women a right to an abortion, which has subsequently been overturned. Specifically, the Respect for Marriage Act will:
Introduced by Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, the Respect for Marriage Act is co-led by Rep. Jeffries along with Equality Caucus co-chairs Rep. Sharice Davids (D-KS), Rep. Mondaire Jones (D-NY), Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney (D-NY), Rep. Mark Pocan (D-WI), Rep. Mark Takano (D-CA), Rep. Angie Craig (D-MN), Rep. Chris Pappas (D-NH) and Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY); Congressional Black Caucus Chairwoman Joyce Beatty (D-OH), Congressional Hispanic Caucus Chairman Rep. Raul Ruiz (D-CA) and Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus Chairwoman Rep. Judy Chu (D-CA). Three letters that hold more power than the supreme rule of law in the land of the free and brave world, always mentioned more than God, SEX. That's right! It also generates the most revenue in any market area around the world. Sex went from a state of being male or female to an act of penetration and various positions requiring exchange of bodily fluids and energy. In the form of a verb, sex is to determine the specimen, mark, or label male or female. In the form of a noun, person, place, or thing, sex is a word of unknown origin. The late 1500's the sex was associated with the female sex, womankind. Moreover, since 1911, the sex impulse has elevated to semiconductor status ready to power any streets in the United States, so no need for the Red-Light District in Amsterdam. The meaning of sex swiftly changed to genitalia by 1933. And before the sex appeal experience was needed in the DC Superior Court for big tech thrills and waivers, sex appeal was attested by 1904 and two years later sexual intercourse was determined to be a preferred description. Being considered a sex object was socially acknowledge until 1901, which then paved the way for the first sex symbol in America, Marilyn Monroe in 1959. A sex symbol acquired a little more than being a sex kitten especially among politicians. Now the simple joys in life can't be pleasing in thy sight without having some sexual relations being associated. How many sexual encounters have you had, and you're still not satisfied? Whose fault is that? Is it the person you are expecting to satisfy and please your sexual desires or is it your fault for not finding the person to bring you emotional satisfaction from the sexual act? This is sort of a dilemma because do you want to damage your sexual organs prior to finding the pleasure which you require? Well, thanks to the Squad Member and former bartender Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) representing the 14th congressional district she introduced H.R. 8394 on July 15, 2022, to protect the constitutional right to engage in private sexual conduct and for other purposes. The Committee chairs will determine whether the bill will move past the committee stage. The sex acts just may cross the bipartisan aisle and they finally agree on a bedroom position that is pleasurable. After so many sexual feelings and much stimulation surpassed the secular sanctuary, several states must secure the rights of those who want to engage in sexual intercourse in private. Pleasure comes in all formats now, and virtual reality sexual positions have been a placeholder for people experiencing monkeypox syndrome or symptoms. Suppose no Cosmo karma sutra for those people at the moment. That involves 77 illustrations of mind-blowing sex positions but not sure if that will satisfy the cravings in America. How deep is your love? Should we analyze sex and love because they are not the same. But both trigger emotions in dynamic ways with different occurrence in events. Who is pushing and amplifying a healthy sex-life? And just exactly what is a healthy sex-life? These are excellent questions because people no longer communicate on such levels most just want to climax and on to the next chapter for another sexual experience or not. What happens when it's no chemistry and one must force some care and concern in the pleasure department? But you have no more principals from being piped down by a person who doesn't value your worth compared to the thread sheet count. Engaging in sexual intercourse used to be sacred and very ceremonial. Currently, sexual engagement has left the security and privacy of one's home for community participation blasting all your sexual desires, fantasies, and your favorite positions in a social media post. Is that not soliciting oneself for something? Perhaps if its Pornhub than its suitable content to share. What happens when that private sexual intercourse moment is with someone underage, and they didn't consent? Because it is a private matter, they shouldn't get prosecuted? It appears as if AOC's bill will usher in many vagabonds breaching the briefs of little boys and the panties of little girls and pedophiles will be protected because its private. If taxpayers are responsible for paying the bill which AOC introduced, then it's a public matter for open discussion. Furthermore, not sure where concerned citizens should take their grievances these days since Congress has turned into a Primetime TV program attempting to pitch their promises to the people but the only thing to matriculate are protections for sex acts. But where's the literature and information and guidance on boundaries of engaging in sex and suppose little girls and boys are no longer off limits in private affairs now. Once it is time to grab a washcloth the feelings of being screwed over could take over so not sure if you received any sexual gratification or just got taking for an emotional rollercoaster. In the end, it is your body and your choice, but a bill is required for acceptance of the constitution preserving private sexual matters. A Standing Ovation for Generation Next: “The Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage in the District”7/18/2022 (This Independent Study was conducted and written May 2010 by Mindy Hill)
When did the tradition of marriage for human civilization shift up right? Maybe, during the homo neanderthalensis era perhaps when they began to gather food. Every human civilization shifts with the moments of that society's progressions. From time-to-time history repeats occurrences, and in some instances it may not. However, was there a time in history when marriage was ratified to accommodate both sexes of their choice, same-SEX marriage? Let’s explore “marriage” for a moment in human civilization. Marriage entered the Book of Common Prayer as a sacrament in 1439, and it wasn’t until one hundred years later after the Reformation, that the Catholic Church required a priest to be present for a marriage to be documented as evident and be considered a religious ceremony. One should say an extra “hell Mary”, because thanks be to Henrietta Maria and Charles I of England. They were the first couple to marry nearest the door of a Church that weddings were allowed to take place within. Some states and countries still practice the traditions of Henrietta Maria and Charles I of England with the union of man and women. Some laws have been socially updated with the parents not having to arrange the best groom or best bride for their child, with gifts presented to the families. And some states recognize Same-SEX marriage, such as the District of Columbia. The other states that recognize Same-SEX marriage include Connecticut, California, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Vermont, and Massachusetts just to name a few. Have you ever considered the different variations of the meaning of marriage? The common denominator equivalent is the return can be a high yield every lasting or a shortfall divorce. At one time in history, marriage was seen as a secular arrangement and according to Council Member David Catania, DC is a secular city; with finance and other settlements being negotiated between the families. According to the 21st American Heritage Dictionary marriage is the legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife or a close union. Recently, in Washington, DC same-SEX couples were able to sign a marriage certificate to validate their union. So exactly how does this apply into the meaning of marriage? “Marriage means different things to different people”, says DC Council Member Catania who authored the bill back in December of 2009, which grants same-SEX couples the rights and benefits as heterosexual couples. “The definition of marriage affects every person and should be debated openly, lawfully, and democratically,” stated Senator Bob Bennett (R-Utah), a staunch opponent of Same-SEX marriage. Marriage is like an atom. The basic unit or structure of life for a family, and in many cases most people join in “marriage” to begin a new life. When that bond is shared, kids are sometimes the result of a new life beginning. Council Member Michael Brown says, “The union of marriage is between persons who love each other regardless of sexual orientation, regardless of creed, religion, or social belief.” Is the institution of marriage a social or civil right? One of the Council votes for the legalization of SAME-SEX marriage was from Phil Mendelson. “I’ve supported the right of two people to marry regardless of gender; it’s a basic civil right,” said Mendelson. Furthermore, one must recognize the distinction between social and civil rights. The homo neanderthalensis were first social community to live in an organized environment in which they worked together gathering food for the community to survive. Whereas in civil rights, are rights belonging to an individual by virtue of citizenship, and as rights of human beings, and freedom from discrimination? In grade school, kids learn in Civics class that 13th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedom of expression and pursuit of happiness. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the US; or deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. The corner stone of civil rights began nine days before President Abraham Lincoln signed the Declaration of Independence, freeing all slaves on July 4, 1776. Which states “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. - That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” In American History, civil rights had a monumental presence of defeat on our soil from Harriet Tubman freeing slaves to Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. The reflections are landmarks throughout several states in the US, such as Atlanta, GA which is the barrel sight of the late great Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. who's famous “I Have a Dream” speech given at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, DC. His dream was sought out in 2009, with the election of President Barrack Obama. African Americans are the delicacies of civil rights as well as architects of our great nation, including D.C. which Benjamin Banneker help design. Being an American, one is granted to freedom of expression. One is able to express him or herself with style of dress, with being in love, with choice of readings, and our word choice. A 4year old pre-school girl told Vanessa Hill, her grandmother, “Nana I’m not supposed to have two mother’s kids should have one mother and one father.” Ms. Hill replied, “you’re correct, and you do have a mom and dad, but you’re special, because you have three moms.” Ms. Hill’s divorced, and her daughter resides with her. What is the case if it’s not Ms. Hill’s circumstance? Most SAME-SEX couples will be seeking to adopt children. Republican Mike Huckabee recently told college journalists that “gay couples should not be permitted to adopt. Children are not puppies,” he said. (The Associated Press). SAME-SEX lady couple number 21, Darcy Kemnitz and Sharra Greer stood in line at DC Superior Court awaiting to sign their marriage certificate says of their future plans “babies, parties, marriage.” They also shared a joke “What does a lesbian bring on a first date? A U-Haul.” They have been together for 9 years. Gays and Lesbians have been on the fronts for equal treatment since the 1950’s. Although in 1779, Thomas Jefferson proposed a law that would mandate castration for gay men and mutilation of nose cartilage for gay women, but the most common penalty on the books was death. It’s often thought that persistence is key to getting the job or task done. With being persistent on the front for civil rights, the gay, lesbian and transgender community has had battles in their own right. Their recording of history began in 1950’s while at a bar, the police started to beat people of the GLT community for no apparent reason other than being different. It wasn’t until they began to fight the officers back, that they had a chance to be free in the “land of the free.” From that moment the LGT community began parades and major advocates on the front to fight the AIDS epidemic, was also the Christian Coalition and other national political organizations became a vehicle for demonizing gays and lesbians and same-gender marriage, as “the source of all ills in America.” The national audience was asked to “send this evil lifestyle back to Satan where it came from,” according to a testimony to the subcommittee on the constitution. Despite pass history occurrences, little to no discrimination against the LGT community is beginning to cease, at least in the district. While at DC Superior court awaiting the signing of their marriage certificate, same sex males, Mat Fornataro and William Donner say of discrimination “we have not personally faced discrimination, DC is pretty liberal for the most part.” Look how far our Nation’s Capital has come since Thomas Jefferson, we have President Obama. Although President Obama didn’t author SAME-SEX legislation in the district it was solely the votes of the Council Members. Senator Bob Bennett (R-Utah) introduced legislation in February 2010, that would guarantee residents of Washington, DC the right to vote and decide whether SAME-SEX marriage licenses should be issued in the nation’s capital rather than allowing the decision to be made by the DC City Council. However, DC Referendum on Marriage Act wasn’t enacted, because DC issued SAME-SEX marriage certificates on March 3, 2010. Although the residents of the district did not vote for the legalization of SAME-SEX marriage, Ward 5 Council Member Harry Thomas Jr., stated “That’s why I thought it was important for the court to hear all challenges and concerns and make the ultimate decision on the process”. The court decided that this legislation was appropriate for consideration, under the District of Columbia Charter, through the normal legislative process. While the district will recognize a marriage of SAME-SEX or opposite sex; what they will not recognize is incestuous marriage, marriages between persons under 16 years old, marriages between certain mentally disabled persons. Mike Huckabee, a possible Republican presidential candidate in 2012, says “the effort to allow gays and lesbians to marry is comparable to legalizing incest, polygamy, and drug use.” Anticipating the wait in line SAME-SEX were excited to sign their marriage certificates, so was SAME-SEX couple Gregory Jones and Jonathan Howard, after being engaged for four months prior to March 3rd. They don’t have a honeymoon planned by looks to one in the future, says “We will always face those people who do not accept us, but we will stand up together and show them that we are proud, and we are going to be happily MARRIED for a very long time.” Congress has had several discussions as to the “Legal Threats to Traditional Marriage” in which Subcommittee on the Constitution Jerrold Nadler from New York address his concerns. Nadler states the threat is the fact that there are thousands of people in this country who very much believe in marriage, who very much want to marry, and who may not marry under the laws of this country. That is the threat, allowing people who want to marry the right to marry? So is SAME-SEX marriage on this threat list. Needless to say, when asked if SAME-SEX Marriage will distort the tradition of family and procreation for generation next, Council Member Phil Mendelson said, “no, marriage is unaffected by this.” Reverend Rob Scienck of the National Clergy Council on Washington disagrees with Council Member Mendelson, saying “it will lead to confusion, marriage is a gift to society and family and the younger generation is at a great disadvantage, we just need better men in fatherless homes, and not a way to have good discourse.” He also said that “marriage is a scared companionship of male and female, and anything absent from that is no longer marriage, it’s something else.” U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder recently gave a speech on the uniqueness of a father in a home, Reverend Scienck said. March 3 was a day that symbolized meaning to SAME-SEX couples in particular Wendy Taylor and her partner La Sarmiento. “We have feeling of joy and recognition that means so much to me, equal all along and valid between two people who love each other.” They own their home and have been together for 8 years. Taylor is still uncertain whether her partner is eligible for health benefits through her plan. Like many of the other couples at DC Superior Court standing in line to sign the “marriage certificate” healthcare coverage was of major concern. Most couples had already owned their homes. With thanks to President Obama signing legislation granting SAME-SEX couples the right to see their companion while at the hospital. This is a step toward recognition around our country. What exactly was the document that the SAME-SEX couples signed? The “marriage certificate” which cost $35, and it will provide substantial boost in marriage license fees and taxes associated with weddings. Moreover, the District should expect an increase in property and income tax payments as more people may opt to move to the city to exercise the provisions of the Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Equality Amendment Act of 2009, suggest Ward 5 Councilman Harry Thomas, Jr. With signing a “certificate of marriage”, do SAME-SEX couples have the same rights and privileges as heterosexual couples? In accordance with the “Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Equality Amendment Act of 2009,” the privileges where deemed “necessary to implement the rights and responsibilities relating to the marital relationships or familiar relationships, gender-specific terms shall be construed to be gender neutral for all purposes throughout the law, whether in context of statute, administrative or court rule, policy, common law, or any other source of civil law.” The D.C. Council has taken a stance to be neutral with regards to gender. The best solutions to solving problems are to remain neutral, at least for the Council members. Residents should expect no charge when concerns arise to inheritance, because no matter the needs of electrons transfer, the Council members view it as a neutral charge. However long the great debate shall last as to what constitutes the meaning of “marriage” we live in a country in which we can have a disagreement or agreements with social updated beliefs and values, but who is left to make the final decision-Generation Next. Then they may decide what distinguished a “marriage license” from “certificate of marriage”. As the human civilization continues to evolve with procreation will “marriage” be of a “tradition” for Generation Next, let’s stand for the social or civil ovation? Having access to data as a public resource is most beneficial when the data hasn't been manipulated for an aphrodisiac appendix. That protocol is a high risk which can be scored starting at 6 with abuse of data secured on spectrum scale of 3 even though 0 and 1 are only required numbers for most computer functions. Not sure which approach Standford will practice computational law from. Perhaps from an arpeggio sound wave and frequency perspective to determine if the delta variant of the coronavirus derived from a China lab and is more of less destructive on the human cells than the LaMDA variant, but who knew this was coming? Did the Omicron Alpha social club chapters know? It couldn't be Dr. Fauci considering he has been the guardian of infectious diseases and has yet to present to the public his cure or even to the Center for Disease Control for extensive medical research and review. Furthermore, why did so many have opposing views towards therapeutic's? Was it enough for Johnson and Johnson to handle so the company had to develop new ways to address the consumer market? According to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation they had some projections and set out on a mission to cure disadvantage countries from disease starting with the most vulnerable in the Americas, black and brown.
Depending upon who you have a observe conversation with an economist will consider a global reset and some self-proclaimed scientist and software companies' owners would classify it as a pandemic. If we look back a century ago roughly 100 years, the bubonic plague was elevated to smallpox and now monkeypox is running rampant in various hotspots with WHO having to figure out what to do. Let's ask AI what's happening? This is a challenge because not all scientists observe artificial intelligence in the same preview or context. Artificial Intelligence is the ability of a computer to perform activities normally thought to require intelligence. While artificial is made by humans rather than occurring in nature and made in imitation of something natural but is not genuine. Artificial Intelligence is best used to solve a problem. It can be expounded upon and examined from two different telescopes. Through one lens it looks like when solving for "if the Federal Communications Commission will extend its jurisdiction beyond outdated analog carriers to video relay services in particular regulations for closed captioning as it pertains to streaming services such as Google's YouTube?" The answers came in at the 10th Industry wide Video Relay Services Interoperability Event in Salt Lake City, Utah. The discussion which took place April 8-11, 2019, with 5 companies testing point-to-point and VRS dial-around calls between 33 different Video Relay Service endpoints with over 50 test cases per endpoint. On April 17, 2019, the five companies reported their discussions to the FCC. These points equal many dots that lead to the law office of Harris Wiltshire and Grannis and their peculiar client representation. During the time their Sorenson VRS and ZVRS clients attended the event, the former Deputy Assistant to the President for Urban Affairs, Justice, & Opportunity, White House, and decoy Roy Austin Jr., mailed a notice via FedEx to an American Journalist. Dated April 18, 2019, "this is a reminder that you are barred from the offices of Harris, Wiltshire, & Grannis LLP. The previous barring notice, dated April 5, 2019, is enclosed for our reference. All further communication with me or anyone at our firm must occur only through U.S. Mail, third-party courier, or the District of Columbia Court of Appeals E-filing system," signed Roy Austin. Pursuant to Rule 34, defendants Google LLC and YouTube LLC first set of requests for production of documents from plaintiff Mindy Hill. Ms. Hill was responsible to produce and permit Google to inspect and copy the requested documents at Harris, Wiltshire, and Grannis LLP, c/o Roy Austin, Jr. within 30 days of the date of service hereof. After this case was filed, Google and YouTube underwent a corporate restructuring such that Google Inc. became Google, LLC and YouTube Inc. became YouTube, LLC and Judge Anthony Epstein signed off on the deal January 16, 2019, siding with defendants allowing them to cyberattack an American journalist. Furthermore, it hasn't been clarified nor depicted if the access points were scheduled to be tested in 2015, but many promises were delivered December 9, 2016, through a simple technical glitch. Grabbing a second telescope the lens focus could be looking towards a September 9, 2016, invitation to the White House hosted by Al Sharpton for National Action Network White House Briefing. The American journalist brought her pressing healthcare concern which was her major issue written on a piece of paper. Luckily, the U.S. White House Chief Data Scientist DJ Patil was present that day because the concern on that paper presented some data issues. It takes more than 8 Obama healthcare applications for software developers to recognize if the same data has been input into a million-dollar system. Where was LaMDA on September 9, 2016, or December 9, 2016? Our highest priority when creating technologies like LaMDA, it builds on earlier Google research, published in 2020, that showed Transformer-based language models trained on dialogue could learn to talk about virtually anything. Since training Google found LaMDA can be fine-tuned to significantly improve the sensibleness and specificity of its responses. Not sure how a multinational's automated closed captioning system problems being solved at the FCC found its way to DC Health Link services ultimately invading the healthcare privacy and terminating the benefits of an American journalist. Who gave Google's legal defense counsel and law office authority to invade and terminate the healthcare benefits? The District of Columbia Council ordained by the straight Mayor Muriel Bowser through coordinated efforts at the DC Economic Security Administration. These entities gave the multinational corporation and its legal defense counsel that authority with the American being required to prove her residency. Some "simple technical glitches," have adverse reactions for "family glitches," sending all sorts of hotspot signals across low density areas in states such as North Carolina, Louisiana, California, Georgia, New York, with much intersectionality networking done by collaborative task force working groups in Washington, DC. Their main goals and objectives are to conceal some concentrated efforts of spreading contamination which has been a preexisting and high-level concern since December 9, 2016. Moreover, AI is irreversible once the damage has been done. There is no repair and the response if one stands against the machine is subject to the Attorney General petitioning to have the persons evaluated for mental and behavioral health. Some people follow a pursuit of programming, and their happiness is found in what software is developed or what application can be featured in Apple or Google Play store. "So, there is no human being who was adjusting the captioning, then correct?" Mr. Austin asked the American journalist under oath in the Law Office of Harris Wiltshire and Grannis on July 26, 2018. The American journalist who was only granted 60 seconds by the court of law to save her own life from the intentional and malicious harms of artificial intelligence replied to Obama's Brother's keeper Mr. Austin, Jr. "Well while the uploading process in which I have no control over which is done by YouTube. During that processing, some coding within the video's captioning to transcribe voice was modified outside of the scope of the automated computer software system." When searching for the recent articles written by Washington's outdated circuits about Mr. Austin Jr., a 404-error code popped up later learning he was removed from the HGW website by January 4,2021. He was a volunteer for the Biden Transition team assisting with Disability Rights before a created opportunity arrived at the Meta Verse January 11,2021. The incubator space with bad law practices donated $25,420.00 to bid in Joe during the campaign season, $4,013 for Board Czar and Vice President Harris who has yet to report how things at the border are going. Before his maternity leave stint, Pete Buttigieg's campaign was given $6,466.00 by Harris Wiltshire and Grannis. As technology upgrades constantly occur so do the rules. These rules must maintain some form of oversight and regulation which can be a challenge for some stubborn companies who are complacent in their ways of conducting business. Chairwoman Rosenworcel suggest a requirement for a "fair shot at the 21st century success is that we get creative." A comprehensive evaluation of programs progress will also accommodate the new rules while negotiating retransmission consent systems for the past decade. Today, the Federal Communications Commission adopted a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to update its rules to ensure TV stations and pay TV providers are using the same data to determine which stations are "local." Through incentives such as flexible use licenses and reaggregated benefits with an extension of 5 years license term with various leasing transactions attached is a great offering. Access to airwaves and spectrum resources build better incentives for leasing opportunity.
Congress required the 1996 Telecommunications Act to be modernized and a lot of effort went into the cause. A system update did also allow for revenue grabs to serve in rural areas so making it simpler and fairer was just. If consumers have more than one channel to consume news than why did those tv stations only rely on one mechanism for October reporting? Neilsen ruled the media ratings world for decades. Furthermore, the MRC accrediting took issue with deep rooted ongoing performance issue and defects in methodology and loss accreditation. Since 2011 until 2019, the FCC has been forced to play Wack-o-mole to rid bad actors who intend on harming consumers to enrich themselves. Having to determine who your local market is can sort of be like pin the tail on the donkey if they're not sure where to start. Broadcast has significantly been viewed outside its market or station which has caused some concerns for reporting but canvasing isn't only conducted during political campaign season. The FCC suggested that "there are no easy fixes" to enhancing competition but starting at strengthen the market can help achieve some form of reporting. Online advertising platforms are at an advantage point on the spectrum while the broadcasting industry has been losing to online advertising sites. The "pitch for Google is they know what you want at the right time," which drives their data, while Apple stiches together their data and these matrices are what drives their market value. Local TV stations will have to rely on data being accurate which can cost according to how much coverage area any analyst must review. The discover is that it is hard to track broadcast data, so the analytics must overcome experience to hurdle over the limitations so identifying new sources is their best station standing in this streaming world now. The FCC Commission's current rules require that local television stations seeking carriage on a pay TV system must determine their local market by reference to the Nielsen annual Station Index Directory in combination with the Nielsen Station Index United States Television Household Estimates. Set the lighting for a very dramatic heart felt scene! And to be or not to be the only missing line from the January 6 Committee hearing on today! Not sure who brainstormed before Day 7 primetime presentation for the proceedings, but it was sort of like watching William Shakespeare play or Bill and Coo at the Lincoln Theater on U Street in Washington DC. Congressman Jamie Raskin represents Maryland's 8th Congressional District set the stage for today's hearing. But he was missing a few props such as strobe lights and it would've been lovely to hear the Gay Men's Choir sing "roll that clip," as he curated the selected scenes to embellish his eloquent delivery of a monologue.
"President Trump knew all these claims were nonsense" and people were open to them early on and it wasn't just the Justice Department suggesting no real evidence of fraud to change election results was one of stanzas Representative Raskins delivered at Day 7, J6 hearing. It was unclear at the time of watching the hearing if he had put in proper context of what the audience would be seeing on the clips. They appeared more like sound bites fussed together for the best narrative to derive at the conclusion that President Trump is solely reasonable for the infrastructure damage on the Capitol Building along with people pushing the door hinges wider than they were initially welcomed in. One soundbite suggested "Julian didn't have lots of evidence but theories," and he along with General Flynn and self-proclaimed Special Counsel Sidney Powell wanted to "facilitate Trump's wishes." Pat Cipollone was able to recall for his soundbite from a December 18 meeting at the White House "I opened the door, saw General Flynn, Sydney Powell and Overstock person look at him and say who are you," from that moment he presumed they were not providing the President with good advice. Furthermore, Cipollone suggested Powell would be granted a security clearance and name her whatever, and he claimed he was forcefully attacked by the trio when all Cipollone wanted to know is "where is the evidence." A clip of Eric Herschmann testimony rolled once in cue by Congressman Jamie Raskin. Herschmann's soundbite stated, "at one-point General Flynn took out a diagram of who was communicating with who," and said screaming was going on the meeting has become intense, but not sure what was specifically stated during that discussion to elevate the room temperature. Rudy Juiliana said the meeting was in the "yellow oval office," and he was in another decorated room. There were many edits and transitions during Day 7 also. According to Raskins rendition and ability to go beyond the algorithms and defy artificial intelligence by interpreting tweets suggesting "Trump's purpose was to mobilize a crowd," and this was derived from a December 19, 2020, tweet that President Trump has sent out. Trump supporters responded immediately emphasized Raskins in his monologue. Unlike the J6 Committee's website which is explicitly served for the purpose of this hearing, website wildprotest.com had list the January 6 Rally time, details, and methods of transportation to promote the event. Congressman Jamie Raskins even ran a soundbite clip from Alex Jones on December 19, calling on "we the people." Another selected soundbite clip suggested "storming into Capitol" as an alternative but no Committee member specified if these were the objectives of the #SaveAmericaRally event planners. Who should be responsible for the synchronicity in messaging when people plan to participate in a peaceful assembly? It's unfortunate they didn't have the COVID-19 team to help plaster #stay6Feet on the cement to detour the people from demonstrating in the halls of Congress. By the way, who's paid for all those binders, clips, podiums, pens, and things that were pick up by those who invited themselves into the Capitol on January 6? In one of the curated clips presented by Congressman Jamie Raskins suggested a "red wedding" was to occur and he interpreted the context as a "pop culture reference to mass slaughter," that almost sounds like "smocking sauce." Day 7 hearing had a distorted Twitter account for safety reasons which wanted to describe the affect President Trump had on the Twitter Platform. No pun intended it would've been like getting the deal through if Elon would've sold Twitter at the time Trump was instrumental to the platform's performance. "He is speaking directly to extremist organizations which concerned him," the distorted Twitter soundbite stated during the hearing. He went further to suggest "Trump used the platform to incite violence," and these grave concerns weighed on the platform's community guidelines, but they remain title holders of no arbiters of free speech. Raskins expressed it was non-specific but clear individuals were willing and ready to take up arms. Some tweets which were selected for Day 7 presentation at the hearing even expressed "ready for civil war part 2." The tweets were read as if Raskins was with that particular individual and knew "what's on their mind." Some people have been indicted from their involvement in the attack on the Capitol building. The President's tweet on December 19, 2020, created a laser light focus for January 6 according to the J6 Committee. PBS news hour described Day 7 as "methodical description." Perhaps the stage has been set for the next act in coming days or will they deliberate from this day forth and put the day behind us so the Biden Administration can now #BuildBackBetter? |
MINDY JOFar from your traditional news, "Welcome to the Mindy Jo News Show," where she shares news that you can absolutely use! And slogan Let's Get Right To It!™ She's often copied, but none can compare. Mindy Jo has a different frequency, and delivery with a unique style of story telling. Delivering dynamic and distinguish ORIGINAL digital news content, along with vary of other original digital streaming content to the District of Columbia and around the World. Archives
April 2024
Categories |