BACK TO THE BASICS |
What a purchase? Elon Musk brings a sink in then all the Nigger bots start spreading out on Twitter10/30/2022 It was considered taking your talents to Paris back in September 2011 and doing it for the Hip Hop culture when "Niggas in Paris." "Ball so hard Motherf***ers wanna fine me, but first niggas gotta fine me," are a few of the lyrics for the song by American rappers Jay-Z and Ye formerly known as Kanye West which is roughly over three minutes in sound wavelength. Now the word "niggers" has made it to many threads in the Twitter community square space right when Elon Musk takes over the $44 Billion dollar free from bot's deal, what type of opportunities in big data and algorithms is that? Not a good start, but perhaps Musk's Twitter modem picked up a cue card from the Munich Security Conference when President Joe Biden was eager to hear nigger heard next.
In February 2021, at the Munich Security Conference (MSC) with Angela and Emmanuel President Joe Biden expressed they'd spent a great morning together. He had participated in the Conference for decades as US Senator and this would be his first time to deliver as President of the United States. The MSC is where they would reaffirm the importance of the transatlantic partnership, including delivering the first international foreign policy address. While at the podium, President Biden stated "sending a clear message to the world: America is back. The transatlantic alliance is back. And we are not looking backward, we are looking forward together." The transatlantic alliance is a strong foundation on which our collective security and our shared prosperity are built. The partnership between Europe and the United States in Biden's view is and must remain the cornerstone of all that we hope to accomplish in the 21st century. "Look, the range of challenges Europe and the United States must take on together is broad, and complex. I'm eager to hear niggered here next from my good friends and outstanding leaders about their thoughts on the way forward together," President Biden stated at the Munich Security Conference. It appears since this statement along with his State of the Union Address in which Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi didn't shred any papers but was proud to stand holding the quivers and arrows for $600 while they send the American's back to the Tabacco farm and plantations. Placing the #youaintblack voters on the back burner in the outhouse because the Biden-Harris Administration will not address any of your grievances brought forth to the administration. Moreover, the only benefactors are the Vice President seat in pearls and chucks clutch with kegel crackling sounds of laughter at all issues except the border, but the czar Kamal Harris hasn't been to that post to take a poll with how many people have crossed the border since the global emergency health pandemic, COVID-19. What hasn't been pleasing in Massa sight was the see-saw playground activity to secure the Twitter acquisition for $44 Billion. The purchaser, Elon Musk from South Africa who had been providing free internet access to Ukraine since the war started didn't support any in America with access to the internet during the peak of Coronavirus, but now many are offered the Affordable Connectivity Program for broadband access. The issue surrounding the purchase date occurring later was the bot to human ratio. There were reports that millions of bots broke free in the threads circulating all sorts of expressions which didn't step on any community square space speech standards. Sure, Dick is somewhere thinking long and hard as to how what's happening has swiftly suppress freedom of speech by big technology multinational corporations and tyrants. Freedom of speech was tested once Elon Musk brought a bathroom sink into the Twitter headquarters. Not sure if the structure had any sanitation problems but Musk made certain the infrastructure was sturdy. After bringing in the fixture, many were fired from their positions and the threads were consumed with nigger trends. There is a strong possibility that sink will help solve the spread of "nigger" trending so close to election and in a cancel culture climate. Why isn't this considered anti-sematic? Probably because some interpret the word as a term of endearment, but that is social engineering. Only one demographic in the American culture can take words that were abusive and tormenting to them and use them as a term of endearment to uplift their culture and peers. How backwards thinking is this? The mental conditioning to accept the word then find a way to nurture the word for later fulfilment and life purpose is part of the problem. What other ethnicity has endured such injustices, abuse, and torture but take the terms used to degrade them and turn them into decorative terms to apply for socializing and standard use for uplifting the culture. A nigger has various meanings, some serpent contingent on spelling, but mostly associated with derogatory connotations and conveyed in context such as Willie Lynch letter. A motherf***er could very well be considered a nigger because of the conditions and acts carried out by one. The term was widely associated with a son forced to have sex with their mother according to the slave master's preference and social styles. Perhaps that's not anti-sematic just abnormal but perceived, promoted, and propagated as the conditioning for the hot spot locations Bill Gates Foundation classifies as "Black." A written text, manuscript or crayon are black in color but that isn't considered a culture, America is a country that many travel to and make their home while those who were born are displaced, called derogatory names but that doesn't stop opportunities in big data civil rights and algorithms. It must be time for niggers to rise in America or go down the drain since they left Paris and reached hashtag trends on Twitter as soon as Elon Musk brought in the sink. What's happening?
0 Comments
A blast from the past, nine years to be exact! So much has changed since that October 28, 2013, day in the district at the courthouse awaiting the Chris Brown verdict. Moreover, the growth as a digital media pioneer and American journalist is the focus for this #FlashbackFriday blast from the past. Perhaps, carpe diem is what can describe the experience but also letting the good times roll is also an attribute to the experience. Time and space are very important and impactful elements when building an ecosystem especially a digital one. At the time of this production, my camera wasn't the best, but that didn't stop the original digital beat story.
Growth and development in a digital era are constant and the frequency builds up over time along with confidence and character. The digital tone that you set for yourself in this era is what can sustain you. Many currents are felt while on the stream and riding the wave of others is how one gets washed away. Being unique in your delivery and digital content is beneficial not just for your portfolio but also to analyze your business model and determine what adjustments need to be made along the way. What's very impressive is 9 years later, the quality and delivery have gain much strengthen and the equipment has been upgraded! After all, taking a risk and betting it all on yourself to set the 21st century digital media model in this everlasting digital era is prolific, which makes her a pioneer. Let's Get Right To It! (Updated 10/24/2022 10:25 a.m.) The discovery on that December 9th day back in 2016 would be the determining factor to do something about the deliberate cyberattack on her credibility and character as an American journalist and digital media pioneer. Either the proprietors had already predictive programmed the outcome of a master plan for malicious interference in business expectancy or the former lawyer with over 25 years of Federal Communications Commission experience interpreting the 1934 Communications Act would afford the co-author of the Big Data Algorithms from the 2014 version to update its format for December 2016 test functions dates. "If you're not going to have counsel, you're going to have to move this litigation along," Judge Holeman stated to the American journalist at one of the scheduling conferences. The process to mitigating bias by big tech has been challenging especially with all the barriers lies manipulation and deceit that surrounds the details, and even members of Congress going so far to block court proceedings. Moreover, Maryland Congressional officials will even invite the ex-parte defense of allege attacker the multinational corporation to testify in the chambers about white supremacy. But that is where the devil hangs out- in the details. What has been devastating to witness is the fact that an American journalist advocated for the deaf and hard of hearing because some big data algorithms and opportunist wanted to test the relay services for several clients. Moreover, attacking the American woman was the worst decision they have made to date, but they have demonstrated how they network to keep their connections concealed while more contamination just spreads like a fiber optic spark.
On the flip side of a digital coin, the FCC Disability Advisory Committee (DAC) could have discussed ways of how the adopted plans and recommendations would pan out. If we fast forward to roughly 11 days after the December 6, 2016, meeting, the American journalist presented the 21st Century question to the FCC. Unfortunately, Chairman Wheeler wasn't able to elaborate he stated, "leave it up to the next Administration." Now that we've circled back to where the proprietors positioned themselves in the relay service race under the arch and hope of audacity, the Bid in glitch administration has gone so far as to fund a broadband package deal and infrastructure bills but can't create a Google document nor memo to apologize for the abuse and torture because a few not so tech savvy cyberattack an American journalist. This is amazing. The damage and abuse done and not one alleges advocate nor civil rights group or Congressional official who allege works on behalf of the people have cared to act on the closed captioning "what's up DC Bitch Girl Maybe Gel with," but will use the case as if nothing ever occurred. They've only had various working groups to work around the pre-existing issues along with many tasks force opportunist which is concerning considering the code of conduct which has been carried out and demonstrated and the denial of due process of the law was the ultimate straw, but they didn't mind the American journalist sitting in the law office under oath? Like the Big Bang Theory, why now? How was the internet of things going to provide any accessibility in this digital era if no one at the DAC presented the question at the December 6, 2016, meeting? Why adopt a policy with recommendations if you have no record to measure an account as to why the recommendation is necessary. What type of progression providing accessibility is that? A very problematic one. Before the decoy incubator holding space skipped to the National Telecommunication and Information Administration in the Department of Commerce for an appointment as Senior Spectrum Advisory, their partner in adhesion bargains Roy Austin Jr, along with his colleague Kristin Sourbeer asked the American journalist on July 26, 2018, while under oath to provide the legal counsel who attended the deposition with her a timeline. This is an excellent opportunity and time to time travel ahead of the November 1, meeting. Not certain if any Disability Advisory Committee members were under oath with former Deputies of the Obama Administration Department of Justice officials acting as ambassadors, but the American journalist and digital media pioneer was. If DAC could have addressed the concern emailed to the FCC, then chances are the American journalist wouldn't have appeared in the court room with shellfish corporations. Mitigating Bias by Big Data and Algorithm Design Timeline:
Now based on that condensed timeline, why didn't the Federal Communications Commission consider sending me a response which suggests we just held a Disability Advisory Committee meeting on December 6, 2016 and adopted the following measures so we can pass your complaint on the DAC for further comments and consideration? Instead, the FCC replied on December 10, 2016, with "Your submission provides the FCC with important information we can use to develop policies to protect consumers, remedy violations of the Communications Act, and encourage future compliance with the law. A Disability Rights Office specialist will review your complaint and, if appropriate, will serve a Notice of Informal Complaint on Alphabet Inc. We will keep you informed by email of the progress of your issue. If you do not have email, we will correspond with you in the format indicated on your complaint." If they really cared about the correct utilization and purpose for closed captioning and how vital it is in a digital era for accessibility then the FCC could've had DAC reply with the December 6, 2016, adoption of "Whereas, IoT (Internet of things) has the potential to impose new challenges for people with disabilities to directly interact with IOT products and services feature or to interact with IoT-powered services intended to offer modes or capabilities for user interaction, if accessibility is not accounted for in their development." Or the email could have read "whereas some examples of these challenges include IoT systems that are aurally base without text displays or text input such as voice recognition interfaces) which may exclude deaf and hard of hearing. IoT has the potential to overcome numerous barriers to equal access to societal participation facing people with disabilities. Whereas video relay service (VRS) interprets or videophone to videophone callers may be unable to leave messages. Whereas, in the absence of video-to-text services, DeafBlind consumers do not currently have functionally equivalent access to telecommunication services." Moreover, it was recommended that the "FCC permanently implement with the advice and participation of diverse groups of DeafBlind consumers inclusive of those who are non-visual ASL signers, VRS video-mail-to-text-services." The preexisting issue and concern for the court in 2023 is why was the relay service software not functioning correctly with the ability to recognize voice data for text transmission in closed captioning format to not be "simple technical glitch" while the American journalist audience viewed the "MGM Grand Opening". The November 1 question for the Disabilities Advisory Committee is "Did the FCC extend its jurisdiction beyond the outdated extraterrestrial desk to online streaming service platforms such as YouTube with particular regulations to closed captioning?" This is a great follow-up considering both Roy Austin, Jr. wanted to know while under oath as well as the American journalist because the FCC hasn't sent the journalist any memo, but Google can help format the document this time. Mr. Austin was also a volunteer for Biden Harris Transition Team on the Disability Accessibility Board before he dashed to the Meta Verse for a created seat January 11, 2021. What's fascinating is the American journalist advocacy efforts were not embedded in accessibility because of sexual orientation or how one sexual identifies and that is probably why till this day we don't know the hard work that has gone in the fight but allow those who feel their sexual desires should be the drive and motivation to make a change, but it hasn't. Was the American journalist cyberattacked for advances in the LGBTQAI+ community? This could very well be the concern considering "what does the LGBT part have to do with the case?" Perhaps the legal defense team for Google and YouTube answered their own question and curiosity when they had to search for some LGBT clerkship at the DC Court of Appeals only to waiver on the sex appeal. Sex is the driving force for the defense and not sure when it became such a high drive for broadband, but it could have very well been when Mr. Roy Austin Jr, former Deputy Assistant in the Obama Administration suggested that the America journalist solicited his office on three occasions. The American journalist was under the impression that in order to produce a brief and appendix transcripts would have to be requested. Not sure if Glady's Hill wheelchair would have afforded any opportunity in algorithms and civil rights, but that relay service client can elaborate on their efforts because "what's up DC bitch girl maybe gel with" has not been corrected but many have used that case caption to amass great contracts and use the court records of the plaintiff to pass the digital bucket to Lexington for getting the deal through, when Al Sharpton was supposed to be getting 21st century policing policy for President Joe Biden to sign but the pretending continues. If they wanted to present the 21st century question to the FCC, why didn't they? Why wait until the American journalist requested transcripts to create a crisis and now look at all the characters and traits embedded in sexual orientation, pleasure, with many desires down to the panties of little girls and boys. But the stimulation is coming from where, AI. The artificial stimulation has made so many feelings rise to the level of creating laws to support that augmentation, and the reality is when you have nothing to identify with other than a sex position then knowing your place in a society can be lost. Luckily, the American journalist didn't desire to be on her back performing any sexual stimulation positions where her head is at the feet of another gender while her rear end is at their mouth for an access point. She was able to pick herself up by her own Tory Burch bootstraps and march on! All the way to the United States Supreme Court where she would meet up with NBC outside on ruling day. The thread sheet count couldn't type up those Google docs considering it started as a simple technical glitch and since elevated to the family glitch, but who's advocacy efforts where embedded in thread sheet count and not technology advancing beyond the bust down dusty news desk. After all this is a digital era, now how will computational law handle this? Typically, the words protect and serve are affiliated with the police, across jurisdictions. But who are they protecting and serving is the question? Not sure if the police have protocols and procedures for taking reports when an account of an incident occurs but it is worth highlighting. This could potentially present many problems if the police officer hasn't had proper training despite the tools used. If an incident occurred on a Sunday, September 25 before noon, why would the police wait for 10 days, on October 5, to report the matter to the court then falsified the document? The officer suggested if the person didn't sign the citation, it would be grounds for an arrest. Now that the officer has falsified the delayed report. The defense sure can't pled guilty to that because that would be agreeing to the lie, and thy shall not commit such sin.
Furthermore, what happens when the person signed the citation with the amount of the offense not exceeding $500 for a $0.25 plastic, but by the time the police officer gives the report to the court of law 10 days later the amount is inflated by $500 to now $1,000. Was this premeditated? Only the officer is aware of why he gave such false information then waited 10 days to report it. Did the account change from the time it took to find the code to attach an offense for the court to categorize the complaint either in the criminal or civil section? Yes, it did, the amount which is critical because most penalties are subject to the monetary value of damages, which allows for the report to even consider court worthy. If the officer had mentioned the $0.25 cost of the saran wrap then it wouldn't be worthy for the court to consider hearing the case, as if you would write $500 then falsify the account 10 days later and it's reached $1,000. The incident which led up to the officer being called could have also been premediated considering that person's actions and the state has picked up the case now. It is unfortunate that foreigner's come to America and use law enforcement as a means to target, threaten and treat American's disrespectfully when they should have been providing customer service according to their business model. The foreigner then gives their account to law enforcement and the police officer alleges they saw the tape. It is not like the person lied to the police about the incident. So why would the police wait for 10 days then falsify the report? It appears much was orchestrated and must wait until December to determine what the motives were for laundromat owner then the police to wait 10 days to falsify the report. Proper training would prevent such poor performance but some policies and procedures for pony show shuffles or sidecar shows still is prevalent and are problematic. What's fascinating is the fact that the words "clean that contamination up," where uttered in the Google proprietor's incubator decoy holding space around the time transcripts were requested April 2019, and the incident occurs at a laundromat on a Sunday before noon. Now that is how everything comes out in the wash, but it will be the court of law. Having training helps but having to falsify the reports for the court is unlawful and the citation should be dismissed. But that is for the District Attorney or the State representative that took over the case because the laundromat owner obviously can't make the court date. Or the citation number captivated various lawyers because they have been solicitating their services through advertisement, and that is the same thing Google's lawyers assumed that the plaintiff was soliciting the law office but when you appear in court perhaps you would be aware of the date you entered, but Bloomberg didn't report it. They opted out to report the Facebook jump instead. Not sure if you have ever recognized how much that is done in a religious filing blanket using the name of Jesus as the shield and protector to perpetrate and propagate everything except for standing in your true purpose. So many people have used Jesus' name to steal from others, collect tithes and offerings, to prey on the parishioners or minor children or committing heinous acts in Jesus' name. This defeats the scripture reading of being healed by his garments or having faith of a mustard seed. The feel has expanded beyond filling up the cup to drink in remembrance of Jesus, they want to sexual orientate now with any young child regardless of age, race, disability, or ability to reason and make a decision without an adult prompting you or contributing to the conversation. What's even more blasphemy are the bold attempts these allege enlighten institutional societies that stomp, shout, and throw up signs while strolling the institutions entitlement to build on legacy foundations without making a significant contribution but just coming in assuming they can change the direction of your writing style because they feel that your writing is historic. Jesus cannot build your character nor personality despite how much you call him by his name. That is the responsibility of the individual, everyone is responsible for their own soul salvation. The scripture says, "faith without works is dead," so therefore, you are required to work towards what you want to achieve, or goals attained but using the work of others to advertise as if your business offers the service and if it does who is the responsible party to deliver on it? That is false advertisement. In a digital era, you want to stand clear of false advertising and misinformation along with fake news, those will cause emotional triggers and hurt your digital wallet while scammers are Scott free. Many like to stand on the shoulders of others but didn't help them lift the weights while in the gym getting fit. That is not acceptable especially if we are supposed to love and help our neighbor. When building any structure everyone should be aware of what materials are going to be used, the architect design of the structure, personnel to build, and people to manage the building phases but if all you contribute is skimming through prior articles to bask in their historic context when will you get caught up to helping the structure? You will not. You are most prone and willing to copy the works of others and see what historic context you can extract and continue to push as if this was a priority for that person. What's most fascinating is I'd voiced this concern to the editor of the publication at the time and we had a conversation. Three years later, back on my own standing, decided to send the editor an email to inquire about their efforts for the deaf community and haven't received any reply or comment. Hopefully Gmail won't tailor their notification to reply. I found this interesting on many levels considering the newcomer wanted to start my year off with a reentry program, but I wanted to highlight my audience who are deaf and hard of hearing. "I've been reviewing previous post from 2015 and up. I was moved when I ready the re-entry piece. It's important to have programs like this that's geared towards helping youths and adults transition back into the community. I felt the stories and message should be a continued voice that inspires other. Stories like these can be a platform that can help prevent individuals from entering the prison system." The news isn't based in feelings despite so many stories being compelling, it's the facts of the matter. And starting 2019 off with 2015 footage was not very innovative for the journalist especially if that wasn't the intended digital beat story. Besides you must have contributed beyond feelings and being moved by articles to attempt to change the direction of the American journalist. They're a newcomer, scanning the work from 2015 of a journalist who had their own section for the biggest demographic in DC. So why now if what I ask? What work has been done besides the groundbreaking and historic measures Ms. Hill has made for the deaf and hard of hearing communities by presenting the 21st century question to the Federal Communication Commission December 2016, along with all the advocacy work and not to mention Hill versus Google Inc. et al and YouTube Inc. et al? Loading Videos... The Hallmark January 6th Hearing has entered new evidence for a turning point in future proceedings10/13/2022 The Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol held their grand finale Business Committee meeting to further analyze how the evidence can be used to further justice for the allege premediated attack by one man Donald Trump on the Capitol. This particular hearing held a different precedence then the prior ones held for the past four months. Chairman Bennie G. Thompson (D-MS) wanted everyone to listen to the "hearing with an open mind." He suggested in his opening statement that "Donald Trump knew he lost. The electoral college met and declared Biden a winner." Chairman Thompson wanted to highlight something very surprising in this hearing setting stating it was striking to find most of the evidence derived from Republicans and aides who worked loyally for Donald Trump. Chairman Thompson also emphasized before opening the floor for presenting evidence that the government functions under the rule of law and will present new evidence during today's hearing. Some of the key facts during this hearing the Committee will commit to the heart of the matter is that the evidence is relevant to the state of the President's mind motivations and intention. Vice-chair Liz Cheney (R-WY) has since recovered from being cast away stated the Department of Justice has been very active in pursuing charges from the evidence which has been presented. She did express that Congress cannot make decisions regarding prosecution however, they did proceed with the Impeachment Managment Team to impeach President Trump prior to the allege J6 attack. The fact which Cheney wanted to get on the record sounded similar to a platform pitch that could be used to propagate some prospective voters for the upcoming election. How convenient to hold a Committee Business meeting not even a month before the next election is considered having an open mind. The evidence presented today would be synthesized to accommodate the evidence which has already been submitted since the hearing initially took place four months ago. The focus points are beyond the three-legged stole Congressman Clyburn likes to lean against for solving matters of equity. First: See if President Trump had premediated plan made. He made the stolen claims on election night then go so far as inventing and spreading lies of election results. On January 5th, President Trump was trying to find fantom evidence that the 2020 election was stolen according to Ms. Cheney's hearing remarks. Second: Recognize President Trump was in a unique position with no evidence to support his claims. He knew courts ruled against him, and later pressured state officials to change election results while summons hundreds to come to attack the Capitol. He further publicly condemned Vice President Mike Pence. "None of this is normal, nor lawful acceptable in our republic," Cheney sternly expressed. "An institution only holds when men and women make them hold," was another profound statement Cheney made during the grand finale of the J6 meetings 26 days away from another critical election. There was no defense Donald Trump was dupped and no one can act this way period was the position Cheney stood on during the hearing. She also was clouded on the optimism of if America will survive another 246 years and it only can continue because "we bind ourselves to the Constitution." Congresswoman Lofgren came in the hearing with a continuum on the ballots that were cast and counted election night. A video featuring Jared Kushner, Donald Trump's son-in-law stated "mail-in ballot looked at it correctly." She also expressed stopping the count would have violated state and federal law. "Frankly we did win the election," suggested President Trump in a November 4, 2020, video clip. President Trump indicated a possibility of a declaration of a victory. It is a strong possibility that projections are best suitable for microdata analysis in the metaverse and not when wanting to win political elections, presidential ones to be exact. The word "essential," arose during the hearing which was dynamic considering essential workers haven't been the trend since President Biden declared COVID-19 was over. Steve Bannon was brought into the backdrop before the January 6 scene almost staging what's to come for the one man show according to the Congressional Committee. "He's going to declare victory," Bannon stated during a podcast show. "It's going to be a firestorm if Biden is winning," Bannon expressed in the video evidence presented at the hearing. Not sure if Roger Stone was selected for this particular hearing in part because of a December 23, 2020, pardon by President Trump but a video showed him expressing "you're wrong f**k you." He later asserts his 5th amendment constitution right not to incriminate himself. The Oath Keepers and Proud Boys were charged with conspiracy to use violent force against the United States and 7 of the Oath Keepers provided security for Roger Stone a special friend to President Trump. Congressman Kinzinger wanted to change the climate of the conditions for the J6 attack and suggested President Trump disregarded the front lines and allowed ISIS and other terrorist organization to advance their networks. He curated the scene during the hearing where then General Millie joint chief of staff at the Pentagon to elaborate on the task of getting US forces out of Somalia. From these actions Kinzinger concluded that the actions of the president who knows his term will end would deliberately not pull troops from Somalia. This is very interesting because prior to today's special hearing for future prosecution didn't mention much about troops beyond those 13 American servicemen left behind in Afghanistan. One video testimony witness suggest that President Trump used "boiler point language," regarding the election. According to the Committee 62 cases have been filed about election claims not supported by facts. None of the 62 cases establish election fraud according to Congressman Kinzinger. "There is no there there," another witness video testimony suggested. What if President Trump felt in his heart and soul that something strange was occurring in the election proceedings and wanted to highlight the potential problems with the election system as a whole unit and not partial only during political infighting? Furthermore, who was he able to report any potential threats to the upcoming election considering they didn't think he'd win the first time around in 2016? Here's another look at the Save America Rally held January 6th, 2021, in Washington DC. Some social justice movements are still standing throughout cities in North America. And now in the social media sphere while a few have slowed the tied to call for a peaceful assembly to bring forth their grievances to Congress. Moreover, the subject matter of Justice in the United States is sort of a catch 22, but the Washington news circuit is fascinated with President Joseph Bidens pick Ketanji Brown-Jackson while justice Kavanagh didn't get the same treatment, but he also wasn't asked to define a woman either. There is a strong possibility justice is more symbolic in the robe of the judges that must sort through those statues to provide a narrowing scope of the subject matter, but justice or else was the slogan seven years ago. The "Justice or Else" movement momentum materialized in the metropolitan city October 10, 2015. When thousands of people from all across America showed freedom of expression sigs as they gathered to hear the National of Islam leader Minister Louis Farrakhan deliver his remarks regarding the mistreatment and the state of the people in the United States. Justice is a delicate subject matter in any jurisdiction, but Congress just can't jolt those feelings. The quality of being just, impartial or fair as it pertains to the administration of law, is justice. Furthermore, Congress upholds an oath to the Constitution so freedom, justice, and liberty for all is a clause they detach and disengage in but constantly introduce those bills they send to the printing office. There is such delusion attached with justice because of the scope or sector found entrenched in the depths and fields of a criminal institution than a civil one which makes assumptions that justice is fair and balanced. Furthermore, justice would have been best practiced at the start of the global health emergency pandemic because the civil liberties of the citizens have been modified a redirected for artificial modifications but nothing to mature in the real world to have a model which citizens can trust. In 2022, what does justice look like outside of the bedroom sheets or intersectionality with sexual stimulation gratification? Love isn't always fair, and it isn't found in justice because emotions have no standing in law only the evidence to support the claim. Nonetheless, where can justice be found in America? Perhaps it depends on the movements position. How many homeschooling portfolios were selected for review in DC and Louisiana post Coronavirus?10/8/2022 A ruler can determine a few things in measurement along with authority. The variation of meaning those authority hold within different statues of law. Learning in the Western civilization has a sort of coin toss consistency and struggle since what was taught is eventually used against the land dwellers to convert to an imbalanced standard while the savage steals to secure his unlawful right. The right to an education didn't start on the yards of Yale but in the country in small cottages where many had to sneak and study. That intimate class structure and setting has not vanished without a trace. In fact, homeschooling has been a reinstated trend and pattern since the global public emergency pandemic Coronavirus later classified as COVID-19.
Some families were able to send their children to the country cottage church school while others had to maintain the homestead and support the family in alternative ways. All the contributions did help with the progress of that family. The concept of an education wasn't always an elevated pitch with elixir to eliminate any excuses to exclude certain people while enforcing what standard should be the foundation for an education in the new world. Education in North America wasn't just heavily influenced and dominated by European flair, John D. Rockefeller wanted to ensure that his care for everyone to obtain an education was sought after when he created the General Education Board. This board was created in 1920 with a million-dollar donation to its cause. The General Education board was to support higher education and medical schools in the United States while helping rule white and black schools in the south. Since the board was created education in America has come equipped with an expensive price tag that doesn't take only 30 days to payoff. The average cost of an education in 2002 was roughly $150,000 with no guaranteed employment if you didn't join those secular societies at higher learning institutions. That cost has increased significantly and most recently some artificial modifications have been made to the Student Loan Programs by the Biden-Harris Administration. Not sure if this was the plan John D. Rockefeller intended with his million-dollar donation, but student loan debt is almost the same as the national debt level while inflation is constantly rising. How has the American education system defined inflation and how does equity have any equilibrium if embedded in inflation? You will only find it floating in the clouds and that is until they reach their COP26 goals. Did John ever think what would happen to the education system during a global health emergency pandemic? He did have some consideration for the medical field so there are some essential elements to his thinking in that aspect. Moreover, what would happen when the moment the parent had to make the decision to pull their child out of the public school system despite them already being home having to virtual learning back in the 1920's? Not sure, but many parents would have rolled up their sleeves and support their families as best as they could and not deprive their child of an education. The right to an education is protected under the Constitution considering your pursuit of happiness. Now many would reconsider paying student loan debt to be happiness but that is the cost associated with higher learning, so the best suggest is study what you want to pursue so that you are happy in the end since it is not free. Furthermore, what is the future of education in America? Will homeschooling be very trendy and surpass the general board of education models? What is the model student look like post COVID-19? What will the education system in America do to ensure that all citizens have a right to an education as they see fit for their unique family structure. By the way, how many homeschooling portfolios were requested for review post COVID-19 in the District of Columbia and the State of Louisiana? It's cool when they do it, it's a problem when I do it, f***'em, says Finesse2Tymes in the song "Back End," and certainly Ye has done it again, taking the fashion world and social media sphere by storm. Surely, fashion is how you make a statement not just in a culture dynamic shift but also when wanting to convey an important message or cause to the world. White only has amassed Balenciaga fashion appeal so no longer needing the 1960's backdrop of water fountains and voting rights now that Ye has uploaded a different algorithm into the Meta verse and social media society norms. For many years the hashtag Black Lives Matter matured in microdata to materialized in mobilizing only at the account of police brutality surrounding low-density hotspot locations. Which furthered the cause of big tech companies to center their corporate structure around social justice using the injustices of a specific skin tone of people to as the subject matters but didn't afford any discounts at the business. Black Lives Matter was the chant and circuit breaker for bringing awareness to the injustices faced by what the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation classify as "black and brown," people in the United States of America only on the sliding scale and scope specifically relating and pertaining to Criminal Justice and police brutality When high fashion intersects with "White Lives Matter," the momentum and shift in the meta verse sends a magnitude of shock waves for various sounds of rebuttal in the format of Tweets and Instagram comments. As long as George Sorros set the funding tone and projections for #BlackLivesMatter the emotions were trending towards #DefundthePolice. This was simultaneously while many cities were being burned down or sprayed with #hashtagBlackLivesMatter. Moreover, Mayor Muriel Bowser went on a national press tour to highlight the yellow paint on fresh asphalt located behind the White House has been dedicated a Black Lives Matter Plaza. The purpose and use for the plaza have limited planning but needs major revitalization after all those gatherings for police killing black people in the United States. It only takes one or two words to redirect the algorithms especially when those words haven't been calculated by the computer data. The business model has obviously been beneficial on many levels which drives the bottom-line for many businesses which have mass appeal towards "Blacks" while the owner of the business is of a different ethnicity. Those marketing pitches don't generate a buzz like Ye did at the recent Balenciga fashion show but adopting those models to make them work for the Black man doesn't have much mass appeal but generates much data. And data is KING in the meta verse and social media sphere. Whoever thought of that pitch phrase and strategy really took it beyond anything Jeff Besso's the Blue Origin, advertiser dollars, bots, or hashtag trendlines and patterns could reach. It makes when Kim Kardashian the former wife of Ye broke the internet look rather raunchy and ridiculous, but they will ridicule Ye for what the t-shirt prints of "White Lives Matter." Now all the computer data scientist, big tech experts, philosophers, and psychologist have much to ponder on and about, but it won't present any problems in law especially when it accounts to white collar crimes. They have heightened and being white holds more value for standing in law than Joe Biden recent US Supreme Court Justice who is happy to be at the table Ketanji Jackson-Brown. No time for debate, just pick up a Black's Law dictionary to know the definition of "Black" in the context of law. The order of the algorithms has taken a swift turn sweeping away all micro data measured in Black Lives Matters algorithms and hashtags, call it climate change in the Meta verse. They've mobilized to reach goals to adjust the climate change so chanting under courage in a zoom setting is fitting for a selective few. Furthermore, stick to the topic of Balenciaga t-shirt fashion trends bring back Law and Order now that White Lives Matter. Ye you're a genius for this cause. Many have misused their purpose by performing for puppet masters. But the pattern hit the Ye button, on or off, but White Lives Matter now. Either in symbolism or tradition somethings stay the same as statues unless Black Lives Matter wants to remove them. While most change has to go through various obstacles courses for better or worse it depends on what needs modifications or updates. When it accounts to climate change that is a different conversation but the temperament for Criminal Justice in America has been at the same boiling point phase since Van Jones last welcomed Meek Mill to discuss how being in prison changed his life. Dreams and Nightmares unfold in mystical ways. But what does Meek Mill have to say currently about the progress of Criminal justice. Perhaps he can call Van Jones from his smartphone or try to reach him if he hasn't gone to lunch with Jeff Besso for some talking points. Van Jones last left off talking about the Criminal Justice system at the 2018 Congressional Black Caucus Annual Legislative Conference before being awarded millions from Jeff Besso's. He won't be crying like he did for Joe Biden in November because the State of Florida won't be participating in any upcoming elections due to Hurrican Ian. And mail-in ballots are not an option if there is not infrastructure in sight, who will be there to collect then count the ballots? Furthermore, it would be beneficial if they brought forth any 21st Century Police policy that is mutual beneficials to the community also but being stuck in the House of Representatives isn't how that becomes law. The Senate must pass the bill so that the President can sign it just like he did for the #StopAsianHate. How has the Congressional Black Caucus upheld their mission and values through a theme "Advancing our Purpose. Elevating Our Power," but what policy is in place currently that is actually law which would achieve this theme for a sustainable outcome. That is beneficial to the community as a whole not just a political pitch because voting is next month. You can only advance when you set the rules to a game and don't follow them when everyone else does. Abusing your power to secure big tech seats for your sorority sisters is not elevating your power but misuse of power and policy. But continue to stroll on down the low-density streets to scope out their next elevating pitch to take over your possessions. |
MINDY JOFar from your traditional news, "Welcome to the Mindy Jo News Show," where she shares news that you can absolutely use! And slogan Let's Get Right To It!™ She's often copied, but none can compare. Mindy Jo has a different frequency, and delivery with a unique style of story telling. Delivering dynamic and distinguish ORIGINAL digital news content, along with vary of other original digital streaming content to the District of Columbia and around the World. Archives
April 2024
Categories |