BACK TO THE BASICS |
Quantum light speed is upon us and 2022 has only a few days remaining so let's recap on the most memorable moments of 2022. Despite our critical natural resources being depleted for demonstrating diplomatic relations, and did we have a time this year! So long 2022, what would we have done without your lessons and experience. We have also learned that men lie, and women's empowerment is exuded through living a soft life while lying about their sexual encounters. And evidence is no longer a part of a criminal court proceeding. Inflation was so insensitive and on the verge of insanity. At least we know what not to do in 2023, and being your own celebrity is the best practice currently.
0 Comments
Far from the "Flavor of Love" reality show, LOVE is often represented with a red heart, or it written out. Furthermore, the act of love is what has been lost. For over the past 10 years we have heard the buzz phrase #LoveWins but what is love? American actress, rapper, and mother, EVE says that "love is blind, it can take over your mind." If we have a conversation with a theologian, they will express that God loved the world so much that he gave us his only begotten son that who so ever believe in him shall never perish but have everlasting life. Not sure if love is as lucrative business as the adult sex entertainment industry but it is only spread at certain times and almost has stipulations and conditions so is that truly love? Love is an energy signature and has various standards. Some people spend their entire life looking for love, but where can it be found if you have never had any engagement or encounter with love nor any encouragement. Should we ask Cambridge dictionary what is love since they have redefined the idea of a woman and man. "You abandoned me, love don't live here anymore," suggested Rose Royce in 1978. Where did unconditional love originate from? Perhaps it is just some utopia ideology which requires an action to give meaning to the word. Love as a particle of speech is considered a noun. Furthermore, love is a feeling along with sexual attraction, affection, friendliness, the love of God, love as an abstract or personification. From the definition it doesn't give many details so after all does #LoveWin or the abstract idea of it being personified as unity and care has many confused and concerned if they have truly experienced love. Is it still cliche that "love" doesn't cost a thing? It depends on what that means to you for any value to be associated with love. The commissioned King James Bible addition suggest in the 10 Commandments that "thou shall love thy neighbor as thy self," but what if you are not aware of what love is and can only associate it with sexual attraction, desires and pleasure? Perhaps it's still love but will you offer this type of love to your neighbor? Love is great as an idea, but we have yet to see the benefits of love on a global scale, but what if unity was an element of love? What do you consider love? Is love an emotion or energy signature that only holds value through affection, and if so, how are you aware of its presence? #LoveIs Six years ago, the 21st century question was presented to the FCC by American Journalist Ms. Hill, which was the start to trouble shooting a closed captioning simple technical glitch error. It was fascinating to learn all the new initiatives that were coming but not many were framing discussions around accessibility nor regulations for online streaming services in particular Google's YouTube. Furthermore, the American journalist was misinformed by the Federal Communications Commission on December 15, 2016, when she presented the question because they did have the jurisdiction at the time to pursue the complaint they acknowledge and ticketed. Moreover, Chairman Pai was trying to figure out a plan for net neutrality.
In fact, the FCC Disability Advisory Committee held a meeting roughly six days before the American journalist would attend the Open Commission Meeting, so it wasn't any reason why they couldn't provide the correct information. It is not clear as to why the Federal Communication Commission misled the journalist, but it has caused unprecedented damage which is irreversible. There is a strong possibility the proprietors which provided extensive guidance interpreting the 1934 Communications Act for the FCC and various telecom clients needed some more actions from the court to build up case law for the empty Communication Video Accessibility Act which became public law October 8, 2010, once former President Barack Obama signed it. Three years later in 2019, the same proprietors which provided many hands-on big tech laws experience and expertise interpreting the Communications Act would mysteriously compile a 21st Century Telecom Media Charter but not many are aware of their markets. How awful? Allegedly many at the White House had desires for "Big Data: Seizing opportunities preserving values," in 2014. That wasn't enough to keep the technocrats filled with their not so genuine gestures to galvanize so they gathered for "Big Data: A Report on Algorithms systems, opportunity, and civil rights," in 2016, which unfortunately the ex-parte defense attorney for Google Inc. et al, allegedly co-authored. Not only did he co-author the report. He also took it a step further to secure his big tech desires under ego driven assumptions to question the American journalist under oath in the law office which provided extensive guidance and interpretating the 1934 Communications Act for the Federal Communications Commission. This was before Mr. Austin Jr., would volunteer for the Biden-Harris Transition team providing tips on stealing the Big Technology intellectual property of an American journalist and abusing a woman for his Brother's Keeper public law because it was empty even though Senator Markey had compassion in his heart when introducing the legislation. Why wasn't the CVAA leaked like the abortion ruling from the United States Supreme Court? Only those who were outside the court on June 14, can allude to any answer. After all the case captions and docket numbers it is rather daunting to discover that as an American first, and journalist second none of this was even warranted nor necessary. But all those who love bells, whistles, and symbolism in the mystical place of Washington can expound upon their big tech roles and if their right or left hand was responsible for signing off on all of the destruction. It was so devastating that the DC Court of Appeals judges had no other choice along the Google cloud but to constantly casting judgements while they deny due process of law to the American. Then procedure to use their process of tainted judgment to invoke Tik Tok terms of service in their opinions as justification for denying the American due process of the law when she never needed to enter Maritime law nor under oath with the Diplomatic real timekeeper. "That disclaiming errors is common looking at comparable services. See e.g., Tik Tok Terms of Service, section 9- Exclusion of Warranties, https:www.tiktok.com/legal/terms-of-use?language.("IN PARTICULAR WE DO NOT REPRESENT OR WARRANT TO YOU THAT... YOUR USE OF THE SERVICE WILL BE... FREE FROM ERROR.") Meanwhile, the journalist didn't use Tik Tok nor Twitch when uploading the MGM content video to the YouTube video sharing platform. There is a clash of big tech ideas considering the CVAA was enacted and was law which could have eliminated any need for the DC Court of Appeals judges to even include a link in their affirmations because it is apparent that a lot of Google play for case captions were the premediated plans of proprietors and policy makers in Washington. Perhaps now is a great time for many to Google karma, or what you put in is what comes out and we are back to the beginning. When the American journalist used common sense to mitigate bias by the design of many big tech talkers in Washington and abroad who still have not found that "DC Bitch girl maybe they can gel with." Not to mention, Ms. Hill has a leash ready to dog walk those at the parks going all the way down to the Patapsco River for baptism. All those lies, manipulation of data, theft of intellectual property, torture, abuse, monitoring all communications and travel needs to be cleaned up. Climate change has been felt in New Iberia, Louisiana recently with a tornado leaving some damage, but that is also where the compelled call derives from and the sunset spark for broadband connections but clean up season is upon us. #DontNeedtoGel Ms. Hill is American first, bar none and fade all that find jurisdiction funny but let's see who will be laughing when the FCC will be up next on the docket at the District Court in the state of Maryland. The glitch v the Gag is that the American did ask the 21st century question however, Washington wasn't ready to provide the correct information nor an equitable resolution. They rather create so much micro data generating volumes of Google documents not found in the application store or on YouTube, but the error still remains despite the CVAA being enacted the entire time of Hill versus Google Inc. et al YouTube Inc. et al, Google LLC et al, and YouTube, LLC et al. At the present the FCC does have the jurisdiction over video programming that has been shown online such as platforms like YouTube, but Robert was wrong and now the independent agency will be held accountable for misleading the consumer and American first. Black America deserves a reboot during a global reset on its leadership considering the conditions of the culture have worsen since 2014. The last synchronization was December 13 in the calendar year of 2014. When civil rights leader and Reverend Al Sharpton went to Washington for a rally to raise concerns about injustices. That same tone still persists eight years later and has reached a screeching sound since the Coronavirus. Furthermore, what does the current leadership for Black America have to offer? What agenda will allow them to leave the Selma bridge behind since the borders are wide open now under the Biden Harris Administration who had the audacity to specify, VP Kamala Harris in particular, they weren't going to do anything just for "Black people." It appears not doing anything even consider their grievances is gaining more momentum while others have laws in place to protect any insensitivity towards their culture. How many more "hands up don't shoot" "# say their names," "no justice no peace," "black lives matter," will be the marching songs. But so many left off on "I can't breathe." What leader's agenda doesn't include those chants only for the concerns to get placed on the back burner? Is it time for Black America to reboot its leadership? It could have all been so simple. But the Alphabet mobsters wanted to do what thy wilt just not with Ms. Hill, an American journalist. The big tech battle started with a tweet which was sent out on December 9, 2016. Requesting the multinational corporation to remove the defaming and malicious closed captioning considering those words were never spoken. And if that were true how did the electronic media file transfer transcribe such phrase? In the background many of former President Obama's task force agency networking buddies, Congressional Committees, and the Federal Communications Commissioners forgot the Communications Video Accessibility Act CVAA was the central public law unit which could have address the defaming closed captioning within 72 hours, but some lowlifes lingering along the deceitful derange clouds wanted some Maritime and Diplomatic record time keeping action, similar to a slave auction, with a pile of lies generated by Katherine Mansfield's testimony only to waiver in the bed room position on filthy sheets with so many stains at the United States Supreme Court. In an illustrious land of latency, the lunatics of language and learned behaviors with low vibration ideologies which lack common sense reasoning have not one remedy for due process of law. From 6 years of observation and hands-on experience that isn't a procedure which is most desirable by the defendants and those whose decorum diminished to upholding denying due process of the law only to steal the intellectual property of the American journalist must justify all of their unclean hand jobs for case captions. The damage is irreversible has reached a gigabyte drive level generating volumes of big tech data regarding misplacement of algorithms and bad machine learning modules when it never needed to be. Back on December 9, 2016, Ms. Hill observed something so shocking and very surprised. In particular with much focus and concentration on the speech articulated and used and what was mysteriously transcribe and transferred through electronic media closed captioning. Yes, technology is advanced and what you put in is what comes out, a very simple binary operation with the number values of zero or one to communicate, but something else was engineered for volumes of case law for civil rights opportunities in the Meta verse. Mitigating deliberate bias by automatic design isn't as instant as sending a tweet to the entity directly, it requires not a desire but determination to do something decent and demonstrate those actions. After sending the tweet which we later discovered Google doesn't recognize tweets in the form of complaints, then tend to prefer a phone call, but we didn't have a broadband dial-up or Affordable connection package deal to divide up back then. Furthermore, sending an email to the FCC was the best start for any corrective action, and the reply was acknowledged then ticketed with the following reply "Your submission provides the FCC with important information we can use to develop policies to protect consumers, remedy violations of the Communications Act, and encourage future compliance with law. A Disability Rights Office specialist will review your complaint and, if appropriate, will serve a Notice of Informal Complaint on Alphabet Inc. We will keep you informed by email of the progress of your issue." On December 12, Robert with the Disability Rights Office and CGB, sent Ms. Hill an email stating "At present, the FCC does not have jurisdiction over video programming that has not been shown on television. However, if you have issues with the automatically generated closed captioning on YouTube, you may opt to compile and submit your own closed captions/subtitles by following the instructions at this link," which was a YouTube link. Moreover, it was discovered at the final Disability Advocacy Committee meeting held November 2022, that the FCC did have the jurisdiction and because of the CVAA they were able to enforce those measures and at bare minimum care for consumers send Alphabet an email. Ms. Hill wanted to ensure that the email she received from Robert was the proper resolve and equitable resolution for solving the deliberate defaming and malicious closed captioning, so she attended the Open Commission meeting held around December 15, and Chairman Wheeler at the time was enthusiastic about his next ventures in life and leave the question for the next administration. Ms. Hill took the advice of then FCC Chairman Wheeler and waited until the next administration in which Chairman Pai hadn't looked into closed captioning for online streaming service with particular to regulations for service providers such as Google's YouTube. He was trying to understand the best way to tackle net neutrality. Ms. Hill then took the matter of the mysterious closed captioning to the DC Superior Court of law December 19, 2016, on the grounds that the Federal Communication Commission did not have the jurisdiction, YouTube couldn't recognize my tweets, and not one member of Congress from Lee, Clarke, Cruz, or Markey could be found to remedy the matter. The forthcoming fact that the FCC had the jurisdiction from the beginning is baffling. Moreover, the mega data and investigative journalism practice were not in vain and verified all key bad actors taken into account their actions on the world wide web staged roles which reveal their most inner workings to discredit honest and decent work of an American woman. Perhaps because she wasn't soliciting her potential across the stream while her original digital news content was working for Washington according to the numbers and she was aware of her market, so someone felt triggered but once campaign contributions are donated and deposited a business transaction has occurred. There is a strong possibility that as long as you can contribute to Joe Biden and Kamala Harris campaign endeavors the law office representing the multinational corporation will be cleared and client free from violation of the Communications Act, although the American journalist articulated to the DC Superior Court in 60 seconds that Google Inc. et al YouTube, Inc. et al had violated the Communications Act. Then the defense counsel can continue their hideous acts for White Collar Crime awards offering over 25 years of experience interpreting the Communications act and providing unlimited guidance and bad practice to the FCC. Furthermore, at the time of those campaign contributions not sure they even remembered the CVAA was sitting and muttering in the background and would appear like buildbackbetter.com and a government website extension then populates. Not one person in Washington could find the CVAA and according to the court records not one case mentioned or alluded to any signing of such provision which afforded the FCC an opportunity to resolve. This is alarming, suspicious, and very concerning because of the critical elements of the closed captioning, the case, and what actually occurred to remedy the matter and the procedures which took place, and what has happened. But due process of the law was never granted. The FCC will soon be made aware of the damages the independent agency has caused by misleading the American journalist, and here is a surface level of the abuse and torture sustain because of the agency:
The brewing beer pack team for the defense counsel compiled this concept to achieve sex appeal in the DC courts but first suggested "In this case Ms. Hill alleges only that the YouTube closed captioning algorithm incorrectly translated her statement "what's up DC this is your girl Mindy Jo," as "What's up DC bitch girl maybe gel with." in her news segment from the MGM Casino FAC @ 3. It is difficult to believe anyone would see this for anything other than it was, a captioning error with Ms. Hill actual language playing simultaneously." The group of 8 defense counsel justified their assumptions as Ms. Hill is someone who has used the common word "bitch" fall far short of the bar for defamation in their corrupt minds of manipulation. Given much consideration Ms. Hill doesn't refer to herself in such common word use nor uses that as a term of credibility, endearment, or decency, despite the Hollywood idea of usage. Ms. Hill has no contractual obligations with such entities nor industry. And never once agreed to terms that her speech would be altered, and words never spoken would automatically be transcribed in the form of electronic media closed captioning. In Ms. Hill's culture calling someone a "bitch" is common grounds to get beat up in some form or fashion.
Apparently, when you work for the law office that has over 25 years of experience providing guidance and interpretation of the Communications Act as enforcement bureau personnel and not one Commissioner from Wheeler to Pai nor bad judgement call coming from Judge Epstein nor LGBT Law clerk experience could locate the Communications Video Accessibility Act President Obama signed into law October 8, 2010. They were adamant on terms of service as rite of passage for times to invoke Tik Tok into their legal affairs as an example of not being liable for the ERRORS, but now many have security concerns. Tell that to the DC Court of Appeals judges who considered using the terms of service implicating because Tik Tok does it this way, Google's YouTube is justified in its behaviors. Furthermore, when networking to collaborate for case captions and the closed captioning was the cause for action, perhaps all the bad judgement calls coming from the clouds surface 6 years later after all the case law has been produced only for the big tech talkers in Washington to steal the intellectual property of the American journalist who never needed to enter the court of law considering the FCC had jurisdiction on that December 10 day. Maybe the need for the former DC Attorney General Karl Racine, DC Child Family Service Agency, DC Community Partner and Rapid Rehousing Clusters, along with DC Council and Mayor Bowser wouldn't have a need or desire to huddle for protecting the multinational corporations since the Communication Video Accessibility Act had been in existence since 2010. DC Council member Charles Allen wouldn't have needed to author and introduce a Facebook Movie Caption bill nor would the Office of the Deaf have to be funded. The cruel and unusual punishment endured was never warranted nor deserving especially when the American first and journalist second went in person to the Federal Communication Commission on more than one occasion to make certain that the information Robert provided was correct and the closed captioning would be remedied. Come 2023, there will have so much big data to sort through and remedy for the Communication Video Accessibility Act considering because the FCC mislead the American first and journalist second all the way to the United States Supreme court when they had the jurisdiction to do something. The independent agency opt-out to care but acknowledge the complaint after a tweet was sent out. Moreover, the American journalist was only granted 60 seconds by the court for an ERROR that has taken over 6 years to remedy but produce volumes of big tech data and case law, so the public law is no longer empty, while many vessels were roaming for a home. The House Committee on Rules held a meeting on Monday without many attending virtually. The Committee had a host of cutting-edge bills for discussion such as the EAGLE Act 2022, Veteran Service Recognition Act of 2022. The James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2023 still needs some language added so not many motions for amendments in relation to that bill, but the one that will potential divide the House ushering in instability after all those billions of dollars spent on infrastructure, H.R. 8404, Respect for Marriage Act. According to members of the Committee the bill that has brought some suspicion in its procedure is the Respect for Marriage Act since it was classified as an emergency. It has not been articulated if this emergency coincides with the recent global pandemic health emergency combating the spread of CoVID-19, but many lost their religion during such devastating times.
Are you religious enough? Was the question the House Committee on Rules had query, but it could be cache considering the doors of the church could not swing open for confession, communion, or prayer while messaging reached ground plastering levels of #socialdistance, #stayhome #washyourhands #wearamask. Therefore, the faith and spirt of the people could simmered down to levels of online church. Church and State hasn't been invoked in the Respect for Marriage Act despite so many using religion as the defense method to measure how far a holy union is federally recognized. The game of cat and mouse sure moves like a ball of cotton on cheap carpet barriers with big campaign contributions, very silent but the fur leaves a trace, and urine has a distinctive scent. Many in America were on the brink of losing their religion since all their civil liberties were restricted to levels of closing down your small business or getting boosters without any consent of what ingredients are in the valves of such vaccines. Moreover, not that Congressman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) has navigated through the Constitutional Crisis, he was rather gnarly in his notion of those who hadn't seen the bill is their personal problem. After sneezing, Nadler not naive stated in "2009 introduced legislation," although the version passed in July, his non-negotiable wavering status suggest the 117th Congress to close the victory to provide stability and provide additional reassurance for those who depend on the bill for lifestyle purposes and more. Doing away with the Defense of Marriage Act would be the guiding scene for adjusting those assurances when they couldn't afford to give the American citizens $600 regardless of if they were mildly or severely affected by the unfathomable conditions of the Corona virus. H.R. 8404 would enshrine marriage equality on a federal level and the color of law would afford some protection on the basis of not denying full marriage. Congressman Jerry Nadler suggested the amendment adds language that affirms religious liberty remains in effect and constitutionally protected, but he feels "in recent months those rights can be taken away." The amendment would not extend these assurances to those in Polygamy marriage. Some leaks should be detected with speed to prevent any pipes from bursting or causing a water to flow uncontrollably. And since that abortion rights ruling and been running filling up the cups of those on Capitol Hill to huddle for the best way to prevent the HVAC team from having to explicitly explain why the logic in the court's decision would undercut H.R. 8404 but using quick fix to stop a leak isn't the best method and the plumber wouldn't object. Congressman Nadler is adamant that the bill would cermet respect for all Americans. In December 2009, DC Mayor Adrien Fenty changed the realm of the city without a bipartisan agreement, without the vote of the people. He signed the "Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Equality Amendment Act of 2009," which allows men and women of Same-sex orientation to join in the holy sacrament of "marriage." What better title for a bill constructed and organized for catastrophe of confusion for generation next. DC Councilmember Phil Mendelson knows "Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Equality Amendment Act" would not have an affect on the next generation to value marriage. Through extensive research, the DC Council had already concluded the outcomes ranging from a boost in the marriage industry to the best chances of passing a bill while President Barack Obama is in office. Although the DC Council wouldn't confirm how long the bill has been on the agenda of "Religious Freedom and Civil Equality," they needed to act now, and without the publics vote- so much for equality there. The Defense of Marriage Act states that the word "marriage" means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife. And the word "spouse" refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife. Now in 2022, recently appointed United States Supreme Court Justice Kentanji Brown-Jackson doesn't know how to define a woman, and there is no more use for "man, woman," and replace them with "birthing person, they, them, non-binary, non-gender," just to name a few. Marriage is the legal status, condition, or relation of one man and one woman united in law for life and a union which ought to exist between a husband and wife, according to Black's Law Dictionary. Furthermore, the DC Council passed "The Act," which recognizes Same-sex marriage and grants couples a "marriage certificate," which grants them the same rights as heterosexual couples. The law is an organized state of confusion for many reasons starting at religion. It isn't hard to see that our society has made a significant change with innovative technologies such as the iPad, however Marriage doesn't have to take this socially updated innovative approach especially if free will is an unalienable right. Representative Scott Fitzgerald (R) of Wisconsin stated during the Committee hearing of the cutting-edge bills that this was the "second time to discuss bill based on false promise," and based on Justice Thomas one line, Democrats are creating the discord that Same-sex couples and interracial marriage is under threat and Congressman Fitzgerld had to provide the Committe with a diagnosis of delusion because they are misrepresenting the opinion. He reminded his colleagues that the body of law flows from one place to the other and because of the disastrous way it was brought to the floor with no hearing has deprived the House Republicans of any ability to draft any amendments. "That's their problem if they haven't read it," Congressman Nadler expressed during the hearing. Congressman Cole wanted to clarify a tax exemption status because of religious beliefs is what's being considered as H.R. 8404. Congressman Michael Burgess (R-MN) suggested the Committee is moving so with regulatory waving some point of order such as a letter sent by Nadler for a close rule many months ago and why a close process for this was what he wanted to take back to his constituency. Congressman "Chip" Roy (R-TX) expressed that H.R. 8404 would be dead for a year if the bill goes back to the Senate, and no chance of evidence of an "Armagedón" if the bill is denied. "I have constituents who think it's an emergency," Committee Chairman Congressman McGovern, stated at the hearing. "Colleagues telling us not to worry about Armagedón at the United States Supreme Court are the same people making Armagedón arrive," stated Congressman Jamie Raskin (D-MD). The drafting of the bill doesn't prescribe a right to discriminate against people and why sexual orientation should be different from racial discrimination as it relates to the emergency of getting Respect for Marriage Act pass. Doing the hockey pocky appears to be what that's all about, if you add one religious scripture to override the stream of commerce the consumer resides but the jurisdiction is now a status the state must allow or prevent. "In July it was an emergency case, in which they have to appear before court which can take months and years to get decided on. This process has been horrible over and over things being ran through," while argue on the floor and let's have the body decided was the decision of Congresswoman Deb Fischer (R-NE). The Georgian calendar has completed two cycles while the Book of Revelations is at the center for task force networking focus groups case work studies for gathering big data to accommodate a public law after an American journalist was misled by the Federal Communications Commission all the way to the United States Supreme Court docket. Meanwhile, the runes are at CVAA levels in which none of the judges Blackburne-Rigsby, Chief Judge; Glickman, Thompson, Beckwith, Easterly, McLeese, Deahl, Associate Judges, Nebeker, Senior Judge for DC Court of Appeals could locate. But the fact of no due process of law is still the preexisting condition which has since generated volumes of big data and case law that didn't exist October 8, 2010. A December 9, 2016, closed captioning is the cause for presenting questions to members of Congress and the FCC, but a case caption was birthed at the DC Superior Court of law when it never needed to be.
Furthermore, the standards and practices for their procedures are pompous for candor and ponyshow purse thrills using their penmanship to formulate fictious entities eliminating any scent of potpourri in the air only for the stench to return to the law office for relay service positions of inserting their clients in crevices for broadband deals that boost their Vice President decorum when delivering announcements in Sunset Louisiana. Being a slave driver to an infectious disease system when allegedly the family was set free by their Presidential Polk master, but that's the "family glitch" that afforded Obama a few chuckles while at the podium to help his Vice President Biden polish up the lack of the Affordable Health Care Acts. Perhaps the system settings functions for algorithm design in the discover of "what's up DC Bitch girl maybe gel with" will mysteriously become a word process model for making a mockery of what's been on their minds from their insertion point. As if the White House puzzle having over 1,000 pieces isn't enough, it's very obvious now that not many FCC Commissioner's cared to find the CVAA or dial-up Congressman Markey made transparent to carry out its use because according to the Disability Advisory Committee the FCC had jurisdiction on that December 2016 day when the question was presented, not sure if the proprietors have that exhibit but they can get it ready for the very near future. Mitigating bias by big tech automatic design can take more than 24 months, but when the Holy Grail is delivered the direction of the co-authors of big data and algorithms opportunities in civil rights run swiftly seeking security setting in the Meta verse. Moreover, members of Congress wanted to twerk for Tik Tok to amass votes in Rhode Island while big tech talkers back in Washington use wishful predictive assumptions to invoke Google's best business practices to be the arch of hope for how they would later come back to regret using them to stand on in the 21st Century Media Telecom Charter. They should've used the lifeline to call Congressman Clyburn for a leg to stand on since he like a three-legged chair. Today, Tik Tok is now considered a security threat according to some leading experts in Washington. (Written Jan. 2010) The viewer has more control in their palm than the director yelling cut after a first take. Some people may consider media literacy as rocket science; however, it’s as simple as pressing the red maybe green power button on your remote control. Because you possess this power you watch what you desire; something with meaning as well as value which communicates it’s worth watching. Your exegis Oxygen’s “Bad Girls Club” with spitting matches is a signifier to watch the next show. Because one has so much control in the ratings most advertisers will keep your heart beating for more of these soap operas. Nothing catches your attention like a new movie trailer with its stylized mechanism of problem and solution. We run to the box office while creating havoc on the roads to get there only for the movies end result of John marrying Sue and they live happily ever after. Some companies exegis has begun to think outside the TV set with niche marketing such as HULU, and Netflix while customers pay nine dollars a month to watch endless movies inside your home with unlimited viewing pleasure on television or computer screen. These niche markets are beneficial being that syntagm relives stress with rush hour traffic, and have your movie delivered to you or conveniently better just click on what you want. With the advances of niche marketing technology has been the beneficiary. We no longer have to write down long messages since twitter’s open brevity text which close your tweets to 140 characters. However, Kim Kardashian may tweet the encoded text while @Lonleylover boy will decode the tweet. The context of technology is brevity and sweet amongst the social networking jobs while reading is being deployed. How can a professor expect some papers to be well written when the intertextuality of tweet is twam? During some parts of the day do we consider breaking the metonymy and recharge the focus on the metaphor? We must have mediation between tweets and embrace ways of learning which most right symbolic exchange may not agree because the teacher may not be in-tune with the genre of writing. However, the student must follow the discourse of the professor, and it may not be as brevity as twitters 140 characters. With all the control in the palm of your hand one may have tuned in to the recent State of the Union Address given by President Obama. His thematic address may cause a few scrounges on the segmented faces of the elephants. President Obama’s linear message was you the viewer with the remote control in your palm. Although what we view of politics may be blind to few none the less the hegemony, President Obama made it transparent that we must value our people of this great country. Republican Bob McDonnell’s brevity experience of government with brilliant representation of sound bite rap lyrics “top-down decision size making” was great to hear. However, when you turn your television to the next channel the plurality may be of preparing the next meal or buying Paula’s knew jewelry line. Although some stereotypes on one channel may differ from one’s hegemony the brevity viewing pleasure may or may not change the exegsis. Quotidian viewing of political candidates marginalize agenda setting the unknown, because some lobbyist is busting their tail to get that GOP client, Bill O’Riley just may be your next infotainment air on your screen with his immediacy. While viewing the recent State of the Union Address the gatekeepers were on duty while earmarks come uncovered, which is not usually quotidian viewing pleasure for Capitol Hill. The synergy of the address may have displeased the quotidian mega conglomeration of their domination tactics and agenda setting. What may change your viewing pleasure is when some of those political actors become computer generated, and virtual media will become the new norm. So, when you are watching Republican Bob McDonnell giving a brevity speech the control should help you connect with him and others at far deeper levels and become sensitive to others ways of multiculturalism. So whatever channel you choose to view whether on the computer screen or to you have television you have the control to power the channel on or off. Just don’t forget to open a book quotidian to refresh your exegsis of the world around you since it will shortly be in the control of your palm. Fast forward to 2022, and the power to control automatically translates as is perceived confidence. But it can cause some confusion in its interpretation and perception especially since the first three letters are c-o-n. Twitter has since elevated its restrictions from 140 words to 240 words for how to many characters will be afforded to the end user expression of "what's happening?" Furthermore, you can't control bots bought by Elon Musk for $44 billion, but the platform has afforded an option to verify account users which will authentic them and designate there status as human and not an artificial intelligent robot. Despite prompting your thought process the pattern for delivering those characters are solely the responsibility of the users and self-control is an option not requirement. No longer a desire after the thought has been expressed in the form of a generated tweet, your ability to express that thought in a public forum with regulations on American's constitutional rights within their social networking ecosystem speaks volumes of control freaks. Power is defined as the ability to do, strength, vigor, or might. However, We the People hold the legal authority to some degree especially when voting is denoted. No matter if the force generates 81 million votes for the 2020 Presidential election or can secure infrastructure deals in Sunset Louisiana, they used their energy in some form or facet. Because DATA is king in a technological ecosystem, he who holds the data rules that particular meta verse or sector, but since the advancement of social media platforms that standard has some stipulations starting at the point of ownership.
Although you are the end user maintaining some self-control and decency for your desires, but the pleasure is all yours. The dictionary defines control as a means to regulate such as temperature or the conditions or outcome of a particular situation or circumstance. It also means to check the accuracy of, and this can cause some mix feelings for those who have been classified and deemed "fake news." Control is to also dominate, such as some say about "white supremacy," they'll go so far as going into the Chambers of Congress to give a witness testimony since Congressman Jamie Raskins invited them. Many people think that President Joe Biden doesn't have any control over his cognitive skills and mobility skills, but he sure stands up at those G20 summits or at the podium during security meetings very eager to hear niggered heard next. Needlesstosay, when one consumes alcohol, much self-control is required and if not, many consequences come from lack of self-control. The audacity to do what thy wilt in America has archetypes and if you're not as affluent as some who believe they have authority over another's free will and life, values, belief system, customs, and traditions gives the Aleister Crowley buzz phrase a little tug and pull from the pits of contradiction. The power to control has always been the premediated obsession of some who claim to be of prestige, but they lack true value because they have no self-control. Many people who suffer from control issues either had some rejections and adversity in their upbringing and are determined to make others feel their torment. Many allege news medias wanted to control the narrative of President Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden and his abuse and use of illicit drugs along with large sums of money in business transactions that are alarming and involve Ukraine, a place which has depleted almost all of American's resources. The hidden aspect of control is that one must be responsible and accountable for which they are wanting to maintain a fact check and regulate. Regardless of the hotspot location Dr. Fauci wasn't able to control the plethora of variants that affected Black and Brown people living in low density areas. In all of his virology years, it was impossible for his scientific experience to maintain much control of a virus in which there is still no consensus on its origin. The great American experiment reveals not much consent in control despite the various variants during a testing phase and it was the responsibility of the consumer to ask the medical physician what substances were being injected into their bodies. But one day, Dr. Fauci can come back to communicate with clarity what caused the need for so many boosters and if that had any effect on stopping the spread of COVID-19. Moreover, every aspect of our daily lives is now bombarded with some digital upgrade or enhancement for better functionality but are you really in control of your settings since much is automatic. Similar to setting up what theme or screen saver your smart device will have, along with selecting your font, these preferences allow the consumer some control over their device that the 3rd party will eventually discover what drives your spending habits and ability for self-control. Considering control isn't a stand-alone possession responsibility and accountability are hidden in the aspects of the controlling force. There is some freedom in control because you are responsible for whatever decisions you make. The power to control is at a freak show level. |
MINDY JOFar from your traditional news, "Welcome to the Mindy Jo News Show," where she shares news that you can absolutely use! And slogan Let's Get Right To It!™ She's often copied, but none can compare. Mindy Jo has a different frequency, and delivery with a unique style of story telling. Delivering dynamic and distinguish ORIGINAL digital news content, along with vary of other original digital streaming content to the District of Columbia and around the World. Archives
April 2024
Categories |